Re: [HACKERS] what is the meaning of "schema"?

2003-06-23 Thread Richard Huxton
On Saturday 21 Jun 2003 11:04 pm, _ wrote: > Hi > > Thanks for the reply especially since I have resigned > myself not to use schema anymore and > unsubscribed from the list. (I subscribed just to post) I've CCd this back to the hackers list, since others may have something to contribute here. >

Re: [HACKERS] what is the meaning of "schema"?

2003-06-21 Thread Richard Huxton
On Friday 20 Jun 2003 4:19 pm, _ wrote: > My understanding of "schema" that I discovered > in 7.3 (I don't think they were available before) > is that you can have two tables with the same name > if they are in different schemas. > > I have done a google search, as well as archive search > but > >

[HACKERS] what is the meaning of "schema"?

2003-06-20 Thread _
My understanding of "schema" that I discovered in 7.3 (I don't think they were available before) is that you can have two tables with the same name if they are in different schemas. I have done a google search, as well as archive search but pg_dump and pg_dumpall are broken if a database contains