Re: [HACKERS] COPY FROM recognize \xDD sequence - addition to

2002-10-17 Thread Bruce Momjian
Gavin Sherry wrote: On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Right now we assume \XXX is octal. We could support \x as hex because \x isn't any special backslash character. However, no one has ever asked for this. Does anyone else think this

Re: [HACKERS] COPY FROM recognize \xDD sequence - addition to copy.c

2002-10-16 Thread Bruce Momjian
Right now we assume \XXX is octal. We could support \x as hex because \x isn't any special backslash character. However, no one has ever asked for this. Does anyone else think this would be benficial? --- Igor Georgiev

Re: [HACKERS] COPY FROM recognize \xDD sequence - addition to copy.c

2002-10-16 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Right now we assume \XXX is octal. We could support \x as hex because \x isn't any special backslash character. However, no one has ever asked for this. Does anyone else think this would be benficial? Well, it seems pretty localized and harmless. If