On 06.11.2010 00:39, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstanand...@dunslane.net writes:
On 11/05/2010 05:45 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Anyway, what this points up is that we are making a very conservative
assumption about what to do when getrlimit() returns RLIM_INFINITY.
It does not seem real reasonable to
On 11/05/2010 05:45 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Anyway, what this points up is that we are making a very conservative
assumption about what to do when getrlimit() returns RLIM_INFINITY.
It does not seem real reasonable to interpret that as 100kB on any
modern platform. I'm inclined to interpret it
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 11/05/2010 05:45 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Anyway, what this points up is that we are making a very conservative
assumption about what to do when getrlimit() returns RLIM_INFINITY.
It does not seem real reasonable to interpret that as 100kB on any
