On 1/24/17 10:23 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> It wouldn't hurt to add a comment as to why things are so different in
> PG10 than other versions, ie:
>
> /*
> * In PG10, sequence meta-data was moved into pg_sequence, so switch to
> * the pg_catalog schema instead of operating in a user schema and p
Peter,
* Peter Eisentraut (peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> On 1/19/17 11:03 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > I'd suggest using our usual approach in pg_dump, which is matching based
> > on the OID, like so:
> >
> > WHERE c.oid = '%u'::oid
> >
> > The OID is in: tbinfo->dobj.catId.oid
> >
On 1/19/17 11:03 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> I'd suggest using our usual approach in pg_dump, which is matching based
> on the OID, like so:
>
> WHERE c.oid = '%u'::oid
>
> The OID is in: tbinfo->dobj.catId.oid
>
> Also, you should move the selectSourceSchema() into the per-version
> branches and
Peter, all,
* Stephen Frost (sfr...@snowman.net) wrote:
> * Peter Eisentraut (pete...@gmx.net) wrote:
> > Add pg_sequence system catalog
>
> The query this added to dumpSequence() seems to think that sequence
> names are unique across databases:
Just FYI, I've added this to the PG10 open items l
Peter,
* Peter Eisentraut (pete...@gmx.net) wrote:
> Add pg_sequence system catalog
The query this added to dumpSequence() seems to think that sequence
names are unique across databases:
appendPQExpBuffer(query,
"SELECT seqstart, seqincrement, "
"CASE WHEN seq
