Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make configuration parameters fall back to their default values
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 08:20:53PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: Gregory Stark wrote: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Eisentraut) writes: Make configuration parameters fall back to their default values when they are removed from the configuration file. It appears that this patch has broken custom GUC variables; at the very least it's broken plperl. Huh, it occurs to me that I haven't seen any plperl regression tests fly by when I've been running regression tests myself. What do I have to do to test if plperl, plpython, etc work with the packed varlena patch? cd src/pl; make installcheck Is there any particular reason why we don't run these as part of a general make check? //Magnus ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make configuration parameters fall back to their default values
Magnus Hagander wrote: On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 08:20:53PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: Gregory Stark wrote: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Eisentraut) writes: Make configuration parameters fall back to their default values when they are removed from the configuration file. It appears that this patch has broken custom GUC variables; at the very least it's broken plperl. Huh, it occurs to me that I haven't seen any plperl regression tests fly by when I've been running regression tests myself. What do I have to do to test if plperl, plpython, etc work with the packed varlena patch? cd src/pl; make installcheck Is there any particular reason why we don't run these as part of a general make check? //Magnus Probably historical more than anything else. The core tests all run regardless of configuration, though, and the PL tests use a different database (by design). When we standardised this we did just enough to enable the buildfarm clients to test PLs sanely. If you think we need more, have a go at it. I should perhaps point out that the buildfarm client can be used to do a comprehensive build and test on your sources, including all the configured PLs, ECPG and the contrib tests, using either the --from-source or --from-source-clean flags. These were originally designed to help diagnose and fix problems disclosed during normal buildfarm runs, but I have found it quite useful when working on substantial projects. You don't need to be registered as a buildfarm member to use the client program, in these modes - no results are uploaded to the server when these flags are used. cheers andrew ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make configuration parameters fall back to their default values
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Eisentraut) writes: Make configuration parameters fall back to their default values when they are removed from the configuration file. It appears that this patch has broken custom GUC variables; at the very least it's broken plperl. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make configuration parameters fall back to their default values
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Eisentraut) writes: Make configuration parameters fall back to their default values when they are removed from the configuration file. It appears that this patch has broken custom GUC variables; at the very least it's broken plperl. Huh, it occurs to me that I haven't seen any plperl regression tests fly by when I've been running regression tests myself. What do I have to do to test if plperl, plpython, etc work with the packed varlena patch? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make configuration parameters fall back to their default values
Gregory Stark wrote: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Eisentraut) writes: Make configuration parameters fall back to their default values when they are removed from the configuration file. It appears that this patch has broken custom GUC variables; at the very least it's broken plperl. Huh, it occurs to me that I haven't seen any plperl regression tests fly by when I've been running regression tests myself. What do I have to do to test if plperl, plpython, etc work with the packed varlena patch? cd src/pl; make installcheck cheers andrew ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make configuration parameters fall back to their default values
Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Huh, it occurs to me that I haven't seen any plperl regression tests fly by when I've been running regression tests myself. What do I have to do to test if plperl, plpython, etc work with the packed varlena patch? cd to $TOP/src/pl, run make installcheck. Make sure you have configured --with all the PLs you want to test. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
