On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On 12/17/13, 8:16 PM, Maciek Sakrejda wrote:
(now with patch--sorry about that)
This patch doesn't apply.
There are some recent changes around
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On 12/17/13, 8:16 PM, Maciek Sakrejda wrote:
(now with patch--sorry about that)
This patch doesn't apply.
There are some recent changes around same place which broke this
patch. Please find the modified patch attached
On 12/17/13, 8:16 PM, Maciek Sakrejda wrote:
(now with patch--sorry about that)
This patch doesn't apply.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Maciek Sakrejda m.sakre...@gmail.com wrote:
VACUUM FREEZE sets both vacuum_freeze_min_age and vacuum_freeze_table_age to
0, but only the former is documented. This patch notes that the other setting
is also affected.
(now with patch--sorry about that)
Your
(now with patch--sorry about that)
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/vacuum.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/vacuum.sgml
index eb71581..5f03343 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/vacuum.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/vacuum.sgml
@@ -100,8 +100,9 @@ VACUUM [ FULL ] [ FREEZE ] [ VERBOSE ] ANALYZE [ replaceable