On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Haribabu Kommi
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:27 AM, Marti Raudsepp wrote:
>>> Thank you so much for the review and patch update. I should have done that
>>> myself, but I've been really busy for the las
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:27 AM, Marti Raudsepp wrote:
>> Thank you so much for the review and patch update. I should have done that
>> myself, but I've been really busy for the last few weeks. :(
>
> Maybe I'm having an attack of the stupids
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:27 AM, Marti Raudsepp wrote:
> Thank you so much for the review and patch update. I should have done that
> myself, but I've been really busy for the last few weeks. :(
Maybe I'm having an attack of the stupids today, but it looks to me
like the changes to pg_constraint.
Hi Haribabu Kommi
Thank you so much for the review and patch update. I should have done that
myself, but I've been really busy for the last few weeks. :(
Regards,
Marti
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Haribabu Kommi
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Haribabu Kommi
> wrote:
> > On Tue
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Haribabu Kommi
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:17 AM, Marti Raudsepp wrote:
>> Hi list
>>
>> The attached patch changes the behavior of multiple ALTER x SET SCHEMA
>> commands, to skip, rather than fail, when the old and new schema is
>> the same.
>>
>> The ad
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Haribabu Kommi
> wrote:
> > I went through the patch, following are my observations,
> >
> > Patch applied with hunks and compiled with out warnings.
> > Basic tests are passed.
>
> I'm interested in hearing opi
David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> > I'm interested in hearing opinions from multiple people about the
> > following two questions:
> >
> > 1. Is the new behavior better than the old behavior?
> > 2. Will breaking backward compatibility make too many p
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> I went through the patch, following are my observations,
>
> Patch applied with hunks and compiled with out warnings.
> Basic tests are passed.
I'm interested in hearing opinions from multiple people about the
following two questions:
1. Is
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:17 AM, Marti Raudsepp wrote:
> Hi list
>
> The attached patch changes the behavior of multiple ALTER x SET SCHEMA
> commands, to skip, rather than fail, when the old and new schema is
> the same.
>
> The advantage is that it's now easier to write DDL scripts that are
>