Tom Lane wrote:
> While there's not anything wrong with this proposed patch in itself,
> I have to admit that I don't see the point.
The points are:
1. It is just unpleasant to leave the overflow.
2. It is not easy for users to understand what they should do when they
encounter the error messag
Toru SHIMOGAKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> + if (numchecks == 0x7FFF)
> + ereport(ERROR,
> +
> (errcode(ERRCODE_PROGRAM_LIMIT_EXCEEDED),
> + errmsg("cannot have more than 2^15-1 checks in a
> table")));
W
