Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] DOC: catalog.sgml

2006-10-04 Thread Zdenek Kotala

Zdenek Kotala wrote:

Alvaro Herrera wrote:



What's global?  A maybe-useful flag would be telling that a table is
shared.  Is that it?  Mind you, it's not useful to me because I know
which tables are shared, but I guess for someone not so familiar with
the catalogs it could have some use.


Global means share table stored in global directory :-). Ok I change it.



There is new version of catalogs overview patch. This version add only 
one column into overview table which contains Oid/Filename for each 
catalog table. Oid information is important if someone need make 
relation with filename on disk and related catalog table.
In this column shared table are marked as well. Other information like 
bootstrap and with-oids are really useless and they is not mentioned.



Zdenek
Index: doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml
===
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml,v
retrieving revision 2.134
diff -c -r2.134 catalogs.sgml
*** doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml	22 Sep 2006 23:20:13 -	2.134
--- doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml	4 Oct 2006 12:17:49 -
***
*** 33,47 
 Most system catalogs are copied from the template database during
 database creation and are thereafter database-specific. A few
 catalogs are physically shared across all databases in a cluster;
!these are noted in the descriptions of the individual catalogs.
/para
  
table id=catalog-table
 titleSystem Catalogs/title
  
!tgroup cols=2
  thead
   row
entryCatalog Name/entry
entryPurpose/entry
   /row
--- 33,49 
 Most system catalogs are copied from the template database during
 database creation and are thereafter database-specific. A few
 catalogs are physically shared across all databases in a cluster;
!these are noted in the Oid/Filename column and in the descriptions
!of the individual catalogs.
/para
  
table id=catalog-table
 titleSystem Catalogs/title
  
!tgroup cols=3
  thead
   row
+   entryOid/Filename/entry
entryCatalog Name/entry
entryPurpose/entry
   /row
***
*** 49,214 
--- 51,249 
  
  tbody
   row
+   entry2600/entry
entrylink linkend=catalog-pg-aggregatestructnamepg_aggregate/structname/link/entry
entryaggregate functions/entry
   /row
  
   row
+   entry2601/entry
entrylink linkend=catalog-pg-amstructnamepg_am/structname/link/entry
entryindex access methods/entry
   /row
  
   row
+   entry2602/entry
entrylink linkend=catalog-pg-amopstructnamepg_amop/structname/link/entry
entryaccess method operators/entry
   /row
  
   row
+   entry2603/entry
entrylink linkend=catalog-pg-amprocstructnamepg_amproc/structname/link/entry
entryaccess method support procedures/entry
   /row
  
   row
+   entry2604/entry
entrylink linkend=catalog-pg-attrdefstructnamepg_attrdef/structname/link/entry
entrycolumn default values/entry
   /row
  
   row
+   entry1249/entry
entrylink linkend=catalog-pg-attributestructnamepg_attribute/structname/link/entry
entrytable columns (quoteattributes/quote)/entry
   /row
  
   row
+   entry1260 (shared)/entry
entrylink linkend=catalog-pg-authidstructnamepg_authid/structname/link/entry
entryauthorization identifiers (roles)/entry
   /row
  
   row
+   entry1261 (shared)/entry
entrylink linkend=catalog-pg-auth-membersstructnamepg_auth_members/structname/link/entry
entryauthorization identifier membership relationships/entry
   /row
  
   row
+   entry1248/entry
entrylink linkend=catalog-pg-autovacuumstructnamepg_autovacuum/structname/link/entry
entryper-relation autovacuum configuration parameters/entry
   /row
  
   row
+   entry2605/entry
entrylink linkend=catalog-pg-caststructnamepg_cast/structname/link/entry
entrycasts (data type conversions)/entry
   /row
  
   row
+   entry1259/entry
entrylink linkend=catalog-pg-classstructnamepg_class/structname/link/entry
entrytables, indexes, sequences, views (quoterelations/quote)/entry
   /row
  
   row
+   entry2606/entry
entrylink linkend=catalog-pg-constraintstructnamepg_constraint/structname/link/entry
entrycheck constraints, unique constraints, primary key constraints, foreign key constraints/entry
   /row
  
   row
+   entry2607/entry
entrylink linkend=catalog-pg-conversionstructnamepg_conversion/structname/link/entry
entryencoding conversion information/entry
   /row
  
   row
+   entry1262 (shared)/entry
entrylink linkend=catalog-pg-databasestructnamepg_database/structname/link/entry
entrydatabases within this database cluster/entry
   

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] DOC: catalog.sgml

2006-10-04 Thread Tom Lane
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 There is new version of catalogs overview patch. This version add only 
 one column into overview table which contains Oid/Filename for each 
 catalog table. Oid information is important if someone need make 
 relation with filename on disk and related catalog table.

I still say this is just confusing clutter.  The proposed patch even
goes so far as to give the OID pride of place as the most important
item you could possibly want to know about a catalog, which is surely
silly.

People who actually want to know this information can look into the
pg_class catalog, which has the advantages of being complete (eg, it
covers indexes too), guaranteed up-to-date, and easily program-readable.
I really do not see the value of putting it in the sgml docs.

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
   subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
   message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] DOC: catalog.sgml

2006-10-04 Thread Zdenek Kotala

Tom Lane wrote:

Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is new version of catalogs overview patch. This version add only 
one column into overview table which contains Oid/Filename for each 
catalog table. Oid information is important if someone need make 
relation with filename on disk and related catalog table.


I still say this is just confusing clutter.  The proposed patch even
goes so far as to give the OID pride of place as the most important
item you could possibly want to know about a catalog, which is surely
silly.


You have right that OID is not important information in many cases, but 
how I said It is useful when you want know relation between filename and 
catalog table.



People who actually want to know this information can look into the
pg_class catalog, which has the advantages of being complete (eg, it
covers indexes too), guaranteed up-to-date, and easily program-readable.
I really do not see the value of putting it in the sgml docs.


You can look into pg_class catalog only if database is running. If you 
have some data corruption problem, OID should help during recovery. But 
you have right, that pg_class have complex information and who want to 
play with datafiles, he must know more than OID.


OK, thanks for response, forget to this patch

Zdenek



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
  choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
  match


Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] DOC: catalog.sgml

2006-09-19 Thread Zdenek Kotala

Tom Lane napsal(a):

Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I little bit enhanced overview catalog tables. I added two new columns. 
First one is OID of catalog table and second one contains attributes 
which determine if the table is bootstrap, with oid and global.


Why is this a good idea?  It seems like mere clutter.



I'm working on pg_upgrade and these information are important for me and 
I think that They should be interest some else.
You can easy determine the file related to if you know the OID. 
Specially when database is shutdown is good to have some information 
source.  If catalog table is global/share or local is very important and 
it is not mentioned anywhere.  If it is created with oid or bootstrap it 
is not important for standard purpose, it is only for fullness.


I know that people who hacking postgres ten years know this, however it 
is internals chapter and for newbies it should be useful. And by the way 
it is documentation and this is completion of information. You can say 
why we have page layout there because it is described in the source code 
and so on...


Zdenek

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] DOC: catalog.sgml

2006-09-19 Thread Zdenek Kotala

Alvaro Herrera wrote:

Tom Lane wrote:

Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I little bit enhanced overview catalog tables. I added two new columns. 
First one is OID of catalog table and second one contains attributes 
which determine if the table is bootstrap, with oid and global.

Why is this a good idea?  It seems like mere clutter.


What's global?  A maybe-useful flag would be telling that a table is
shared.  Is that it?  Mind you, it's not useful to me because I know
which tables are shared, but I guess for someone not so familiar with
the catalogs it could have some use.


Global means share table stored in global directory :-). Ok I change it.

Thanks for comment Zdenek


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] DOC: catalog.sgml

2006-09-04 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 12:01:06AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
 But ever since 7.3 the convention for identifying system objects has
 been pretty well-defined: anything that lives in one of the predefined
 schemas.  What problem were you having using that approach in
 newsysviews?

It was just an issue of trawling through pg_dump to confirm that.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
   choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
   match


Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] DOC: catalog.sgml

2006-09-02 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 12:36:11PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
 Tom Lane wrote:
  Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
   I little bit enhanced overview catalog tables. I added two new columns. 
   First one is OID of catalog table and second one contains attributes 
   which determine if the table is bootstrap, with oid and global.
  
  Why is this a good idea?  It seems like mere clutter.
 
 What's global?  A maybe-useful flag would be telling that a table is
 shared.  Is that it?  Mind you, it's not useful to me because I know
 which tables are shared, but I guess for someone not so familiar with
 the catalogs it could have some use.
 
 The OIDs may be useful to people inspecting pg_depend, for example; but
 then, it's foolish not to be using regclass in that case.
 
 Whether a table is bootstrap or not doesn't seem useful to me.

Something that might be handy would be a method to determine if an
object is a system object or not (perhaps what the OP means by
bootstrap). We spent quite some time figuring out how to handle that
when we were working on newsysviews. In that case, we wanted the info
because it's handy to be able to query a view that's not cluttered up
with a bunch of system-defined stuff. Having a way to get a list of only
user-defined functions, for example.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] DOC: catalog.sgml

2006-09-02 Thread Tom Lane
Jim C. Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 12:36:11PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
 Whether a table is bootstrap or not doesn't seem useful to me.

 Something that might be handy would be a method to determine if an
 object is a system object or not (perhaps what the OP means by
 bootstrap).

No, what the OP meant by bootstrap is one of the four core
BKI_BOOTSTRAP catalogs, and the reason they're so core is that bootstrap
mode itself doesn't really work till they exist.  (I agree with Alvaro
that by the time you get interested in what BKI_BOOTSTRAP does, you
probably don't need to have any hand-holding from catalogs.sgml; you're
already at least an apprentice wizard.)

But ever since 7.3 the convention for identifying system objects has
been pretty well-defined: anything that lives in one of the predefined
schemas.  What problem were you having using that approach in
newsysviews?

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] DOC: catalog.sgml

2006-09-01 Thread Tom Lane
Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 I little bit enhanced overview catalog tables. I added two new columns. 
 First one is OID of catalog table and second one contains attributes 
 which determine if the table is bootstrap, with oid and global.

Why is this a good idea?  It seems like mere clutter.

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
   choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
   match


Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] DOC: catalog.sgml

2006-09-01 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Tom Lane wrote:
 Zdenek Kotala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  I little bit enhanced overview catalog tables. I added two new columns. 
  First one is OID of catalog table and second one contains attributes 
  which determine if the table is bootstrap, with oid and global.
 
 Why is this a good idea?  It seems like mere clutter.

What's global?  A maybe-useful flag would be telling that a table is
shared.  Is that it?  Mind you, it's not useful to me because I know
which tables are shared, but I guess for someone not so familiar with
the catalogs it could have some use.

The OIDs may be useful to people inspecting pg_depend, for example; but
then, it's foolish not to be using regclass in that case.

Whether a table is bootstrap or not doesn't seem useful to me.

-- 
Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster