Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] GUC description cleanup

2006-10-27 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Donnerstag, 26. Oktober 2006 19:47 schrieb Neil Conway: Note that this patch breaks the translations of these strings, so I haven't applied it yet. Should I apply it now, or wait for 8.3 to branch? I appreciate this effort, but I think it's better to hold the patch. -- Peter Eisentraut

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] GUC description cleanup

2006-10-27 Thread Neil Conway
On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 15:59 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: I appreciate this effort, but I think it's better to hold the patch. Sure, I'll wait for 8.3 to branch. -Neil ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] GUC description cleanup

2006-10-27 Thread Josh Berkus
Neil, Sure, I'll wait for 8.3 to branch. I have some cleanup I want to do for 8.3 too. Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco 415-752-2500 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] GUC description cleanup

2006-10-26 Thread Tom Lane
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BTW, should pre_auth_delay be included in SHOW ALL? It's really just a debug aid, so I wouldn't complain if SHOW ALL didn't show it. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2:

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] GUC description cleanup

2006-10-26 Thread Tom Lane
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Note that this patch breaks the translations of these strings, so I haven't applied it yet. Should I apply it now, or wait for 8.3 to branch? BTW, unless Peter says it's OK, my advice is to wait. It's already likely to be the case that translation updates