Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] The vacuum-ignore-vacuum patch

2006-07-24 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hannu Krossing asked me about his patch to ignore transactions running VACUUM LAZY in other vacuum transactions. I attach a version of the patch updated to the current sources. nonInVacuumXmin seems useless ... perhaps a vestige of some earlier version

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] The vacuum-ignore-vacuum patch

2006-07-24 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Tom Lane wrote: Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hannu Krossing asked me about his patch to ignore transactions running VACUUM LAZY in other vacuum transactions. I attach a version of the patch updated to the current sources. nonInVacuumXmin seems useless ... perhaps a vestige

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] The vacuum-ignore-vacuum patch

2006-07-24 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: A possible objection to this is that it would foreclose running VACUUM and ANALYZE as a single transaction, exactly because of the point that we couldn't insert pg_statistic rows using a lazy vacuum's XID. Hmm, what about having a