-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Treat
Sent: 23 August 2006 04:16
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: Peter Eisentraut; Tom Lane
Subject: Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [HACKERS]
[PATCHES] selecting large result
On Thursday 17 August 2006 11:55, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah, that experiment hasn't seemed to work all that well for me
either. Do you have another idea to try, or do you just want to
revert to the old way?
Since almost the first day I hacked on PostgreSQL I have been
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert Treat wrote:
... some other tricks people have to make emails more manageable (anyone
combine all pg mail to one folder?)
Yes, all mine are in one folder, and I use elm ME. It is faster than a
GUI email client.
All my PG list mail goes into
On Aug 23, 2006, at 12:15 , Robert Treat wrote:
On Thursday 17 August 2006 11:55, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah, that experiment hasn't seemed to work all that well for me
either. Do you have another idea to try, or do you just want to
revert to the old way?
Since almost
Tom Lane wrote:
BTW, \u seems not to have any mnemonic value whatsoever ... isn't
there some other name we could use?
Ever since pgsql-patches replies started going to -hackers, threading
doesn't work anymore, so I for one can't tell what this refers to at
all.
--
Peter Eisentraut
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ever since pgsql-patches replies started going to -hackers, threading
doesn't work anymore, so I for one can't tell what this refers to at
all.
Yeah, that experiment hasn't seemed to work all that well for me
either. Do you have another idea to
Hi,
thanks for reviewing this :)
attached is the new and fixed version of the patch for selecting
large result sets from psql using cursors.
The is_select_command bit is wrong because it doesn't allow for left
parentheses in front of the SELECT keyword (something entirely
reasonable
Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah, that experiment hasn't seemed to work all that well for me
either. Do you have another idea to try, or do you just want to
revert to the old way?
Since almost the first day I hacked on PostgreSQL I have been filtering
both lists into the same folder, so they pretty much
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 09:20:43AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ever since pgsql-patches replies started going to -hackers, threading
doesn't work anymore, so I for one can't tell what this refers to at
all.
Yeah, that experiment hasn't seemed to
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Chris Mair wrote:
Since buffer commands all have a single char I wanted a single char one
too. The c for cursor was taken already, so i choose the u (second
char in cursor). If somebody has a better suggestion, let us know ;)
I think a new backslash
Chris Mair [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
attached is the new and fixed version of the patch for selecting
large result sets from psql using cursors.
The is_select_command bit is wrong because it doesn't allow for left
parentheses in front of the SELECT keyword (something entirely
reasonable when
11 matches
Mail list logo
