On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 1:41 AM, Andreas Seltenreich wrote:
> Amit Kapila writes:
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Thomas Munro
>> wrote:
>>> Or maybe just like this?
>>>
>>> - snapshot->subxip = snapshot->xip +
>>>
Amit Kapila writes:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Thomas Munro
> wrote:
>> Or maybe just like this?
>>
>> - snapshot->subxip = snapshot->xip + serialized_snapshot->xcnt;
>> + snapshot->subxip = ((TransactionId *) (snapshot + 1)) +
>>
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Thomas Munro
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Thomas Munro
>> wrote:
>>> If serialized_snapshot->xcnt == 0, then
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Thomas Munro
> wrote:
>> If serialized_snapshot->xcnt == 0, then snapshot->xip never gets
>> initialized to a non-NULL value. Then if
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Thomas Munro
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:26 AM, Andreas Seltenreich
wrote:
> >> #1 0x00822032 in
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:26 AM, Andreas Seltenreich
> wrote:
>> #1 0x00822032 in RestoreSnapshot
>> (start_address=start_address@entry=0x7f2701d5a110 > memory at address
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:26 AM, Andreas Seltenreich wrote:
> #1 0x00822032 in RestoreSnapshot
> (start_address=start_address@entry=0x7f2701d5a110 memory at address 0x7f2701d5a110>) at snapmgr.c:2020
memcpy(snapshot->subxip, serialized_xids +