On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 01:26 +, Simon Riggs wrote:
I'll test and commit tomorrow, since it's a fairly standalone problem
Fix attached, thanks for testing.
Works for me and I don't expect it to fail on Solaris, since the root
cause of the failure has been addressed and a correctly designed
On Jan 8, 2010, at 7:36 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 01:26 +, Simon Riggs wrote:
I'll test and commit tomorrow, since it's a fairly standalone problem
Fix attached, thanks for testing.
Works for me and I don't expect it to fail on Solaris, since the root
cause of the
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 14:41 -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
Doing some testing with 8.5alpha3, my standby crashed this morning whilst
doing some testing. Seems I have a core file, so thought I would send a
report.
Thanks for the report.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
--
Sent
Robert Treat xzi...@users.sourceforge.net writes:
Doing some testing with 8.5alpha3, my standby crashed this morning whilst
doing some testing. Seems I have a core file, so thought I would send a
report.
Hmm. Looks like it's crashing because DatabasePath is not set yet.
We could probably
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 14:41 -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
Doing some testing with 8.5alpha3, my standby crashed this morning whilst
doing some testing. Seems I have a core file, so thought I would send a
report.
Version: PostgreSQL 8.5alpha3 on i386-pc-solaris2.10, compiled by GCC gcc
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 16:05 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Treat xzi...@users.sourceforge.net writes:
Doing some testing with 8.5alpha3, my standby crashed this morning whilst
doing some testing. Seems I have a core file, so thought I would send a
report.
Hmm. Looks like it's crashing
On Jan 7, 2010, at 4:15 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 14:41 -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
Doing some testing with 8.5alpha3, my standby crashed this morning
whilst
doing some testing. Seems I have a core file, so thought I would
send a report.
Version: PostgreSQL 8.5alpha3
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 16:56 -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
Not much more to send really.
No problem. I can see what causes it, nothing more required, thanks.
What I don't fully understand yet is why the error hasn't shown itself
before, because it appears such a basic error.
--
Simon Riggs
On Jan 7, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 16:56 -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
Not much more to send really.
No problem. I can see what causes it, nothing more required, thanks.
What I don't fully understand yet is why the error hasn't shown itself
before, because it
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 18:02 -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
On Jan 7, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 16:56 -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
Not much more to send really.
No problem. I can see what causes it, nothing more required, thanks.
What I don't fully
10 matches
Mail list logo
