Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-30 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 02:23, Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org wrote: On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 13:23 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: (As a side note, RPMs *may not* be ready, because I (and Magnus) will be at PGDay Turkey on 12th, and will be busy over the whole weekend). Is that a closed meeting?

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-29 Thread Simon Riggs
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org wrote: (As a side note, RPMs *may not* be ready, because I (and Magnus) will be at PGDay Turkey on 12th, and will be busy over the whole weekend). Is that a closed meeting? I hadn't seen any mention of that anywhere. --  Simon

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-29 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 14:23, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org wrote: (As a side note, RPMs *may not* be ready, because I (and Magnus) will be at PGDay Turkey on 12th, and will be busy over the whole weekend). Is that

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-29 Thread Jay Levitt
Magnus Hagander wrote: 2012/4/28 Josh Berkusj...@agliodbs.com: Ugh. Maybe the whole idea of getting a beta out before PGCon is doomed. Still, if we don't try for this schedule, we're looking at at least two more weeks' slip, because we're surely not going to wrap during PGCon. We could do it

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-29 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 13:23 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: (As a side note, RPMs *may not* be ready, because I (and Magnus) will be at PGDay Turkey on 12th, and will be busy over the whole weekend). Is that a closed meeting? I hadn't seen any mention of that anywhere. Not that much. I've been

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-28 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Hi, On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 21:17 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: We release the alpha with no packaging. I have released RPMs regularly for all alphas before, at least over the last 2 years or so. Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-28 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 01:02, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes: On 4/27/12 2:29 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: Someone said one week as not enough, so I assumed a wrap on May 10 with beta release on May 14. Doing a release on May 14 will be a challenge,

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-28 Thread Magnus Hagander
2012/4/28 Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com: Ugh.  Maybe the whole idea of getting a beta out before PGCon is doomed. Still, if we don't try for this schedule, we're looking at at least two more weeks' slip, because we're surely not going to wrap during PGCon. We could do it in person! We could

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-27 Thread Josh Berkus
I suspect that's a bit aggressive. We have a couple of issues that I think we should fix before beta1: Hmmm. So are we looking at May 7? Or later? I'd like to do some press work for this. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 02:16:02PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: I suspect that's a bit aggressive. We have a couple of issues that I think we should fix before beta1: Hmmm. So are we looking at May 7? Or later? I'd like to do some press work for this. Someone said one week as not

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-27 Thread Josh Berkus
On 4/27/12 2:29 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 02:16:02PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: I suspect that's a bit aggressive. We have a couple of issues that I think we should fix before beta1: Hmmm. So are we looking at May 7? Or later? I'd like to do some press work for

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 02:43:13PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: On 4/27/12 2:29 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 02:16:02PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: I suspect that's a bit aggressive. We have a couple of issues that I think we should fix before beta1: Hmmm. So are we

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-27 Thread Tom Lane
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes: On 4/27/12 2:29 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: Someone said one week as not enough, so I assumed a wrap on May 10 with beta release on May 14. Doing a release on May 14 will be a challenge, thanks to people being on airplanes to pgCon. We might want to verify

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-27 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Hi, On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 19:02 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: The website crew might have a problem though. Magnus is flying on 13th and 14th, Dave, Stefan and Thom are flying on 14th. I'm flying on 15th -- it seems I have some cycles for updating website, I hope. Not sure about the others. (As a

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-27 Thread Tom Lane
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= dev...@gunduz.org writes: (As a side note, RPMs *may not* be ready, because I (and Magnus) will be at PGDay Turkey on 12th, and will be busy over the whole weekend). Ugh. Maybe the whole idea of getting a beta out before PGCon is doomed. Still, if we don't

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:19:55PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= dev...@gunduz.org writes: (As a side note, RPMs *may not* be ready, because I (and Magnus) will be at PGDay Turkey on 12th, and will be busy over the whole weekend). Ugh. Maybe the whole idea of

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-27 Thread Josh Berkus
Ugh. Maybe the whole idea of getting a beta out before PGCon is doomed. Still, if we don't try for this schedule, we're looking at at least two more weeks' slip, because we're surely not going to wrap during PGCon. We could do it in person! -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc.

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-27 Thread Josh Berkus
Do we want to do the normal package Thursday, release Monday process? I assumed we did. Given that in the last 2 years, our betas have been news, I think we need to. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-27 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes: On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:19:55PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Ugh. Maybe the whole idea of getting a beta out before PGCon is doomed. Still, if we don't try for this schedule, we're looking at at least two more weeks' slip, because we're surely not going to

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 09:10:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes: On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:19:55PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Ugh. Maybe the whole idea of getting a beta out before PGCon is doomed. Still, if we don't try for this schedule, we're looking at at

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-27 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes: On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 09:10:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: How would that help? The bottleneck is packaging, which is the same work whatever we call it. We release the alpha with no packaging. Think we'd lose a lot of potential testers that way.

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-27 Thread David Johnston
On Apr 27, 2012, at 21:24, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes: On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 09:10:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: How would that help? The bottleneck is packaging, which is the same work whatever we call it. We release the alpha with no

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-26 Thread Simon Riggs
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes: I had hoped to complete the release notes by March 30, but travel and catching up on old stuff has delayed that.  

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 01:29:38PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:40:09PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote: I just talked to Tom about the 9.2 release notes.  Do people want me to write the 9.2 release

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-25 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes: I had hoped to complete the release notes by March 30, but travel and catching up on old stuff has delayed that. I will start working on them now and have them ready before we start beta. If that is a problem, please let me know. Well, we aren't ready

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-25 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes: I had hoped to complete the release notes by March 30, but travel and catching up on old stuff has delayed that.  I will start working on them now and have them ready before we start

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-25 Thread Dave Page
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes: I had hoped to complete the release notes by March 30, but travel and catching up on old stuff has delayed that.  I will start working on them now and have them ready before we start

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-25 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Would it be reasonable to shoot for wrapping 9.2beta1 next week? I suspect that's a bit aggressive. We have a couple of issues that I think we should fix before beta1: - the

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-25 Thread Tom Lane
Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org writes: On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Would it be reasonable to shoot for wrapping 9.2beta1 next week? (That would mean a wrap on Thursday May 3, if we follow the usual type of release schedule.) I doubt we'll be able to

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-25 Thread Dave Page
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org writes: On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Would it be reasonable to shoot for wrapping 9.2beta1 next week? (That would mean a wrap on Thursday May 3, if we follow

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-13 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote: I just talked to Tom about the 9.2 release notes.  Do people want me to write the 9.2 release notes? +1. When do you think we will be ready for 9.2 beta? Well, we've got a bunch of open issues, but most of them don't

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-13 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes: On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote: When do you think we will be ready for 9.2 beta? Well, we've got a bunch of open issues, but most of them don't look *too* serious. If everyone dropped what they're doing and

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-13 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes: On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote: When do you think we will be ready for 9.2 beta? Well, we've got a bunch of open issues, but most of them

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release notes, beta time?

2012-04-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:40:09PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote: I just talked to Tom about the 9.2 release notes.  Do people want me to write the 9.2 release notes? +1. When do you think we will be ready for 9.2