I wrote:
Attached is a draft patch against HEAD for this.
I've finished back-porting this. I'm not going to commit it until 9.2.0
is definitely gold, but attached is the 9.1 version of the patch, if
you'd like to try it and verify that it fixes your original problem.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 6:09 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I wrote:
I think probably the best fix is to rejigger things so that Params
assigned by different executions of SS_replace_correlation_vars and
createplan.c can't share PARAM_EXEC numbers. This will result in
rather
On 5 September 2012 05:09, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I wrote:
I think probably the best fix is to rejigger things so that Params
assigned by different executions of SS_replace_correlation_vars and
createplan.c can't share PARAM_EXEC numbers. This will result in
rather larger
Thom Brown t...@linux.com writes:
On 5 September 2012 05:09, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Attached is a draft patch against HEAD for this. I think it makes the
planner's handling of outer-level Params far less squishy than it's ever
been, but it is rather a large change. Not sure
BTW, after considerable fooling around with Vik's example, I've been
able to produce a regression test case that fails in all PG versions
with WITH:
with
A as ( select q2 as id, (select q1) as x from int8_tbl ),
B as ( select id, row_number() over (partition by id) as r from A ),
C as ( select
Vik Reykja vikrey...@gmail.com writes:
Hello. It took me a while to get a version of this that was independent of
my data, but here it is. I don't understand what's going wrong but if you
change any part of this query (or at least any part I tried), the correct
result is returned.
Huh. 9.1
I wrote:
Vik Reykja vikrey...@gmail.com writes:
Hello. It took me a while to get a version of this that was independent of
my data, but here it is. I don't understand what's going wrong but if you
change any part of this query (or at least any part I tried), the correct
result is returned.
I wrote:
I think probably the best fix is to rejigger things so that Params
assigned by different executions of SS_replace_correlation_vars and
createplan.c can't share PARAM_EXEC numbers. This will result in
rather larger ecxt_param_exec_vals arrays at runtime, but the array
entries aren't
