Re: [HACKERS] 9.4 checksum error in recovery with btree index

2014-05-20 Thread Michael Paquier
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:10 AM, Jeff Janes wrote: > What would be a good way of doing that? Mostly I've just been sharing it > on google drive when I find something. Should I fork the mirror from > github (https://github.com/postgres/postgres)? Forking the entire > codebase just to have a 200

Re: [HACKERS] 9.4 checksum error in recovery with btree index

2014-05-19 Thread Jeff Janes
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 05/18/2014 06:30 AM, Jeff Janes wrote: > >> On Saturday, May 17, 2014, Heikki Linnakangas >> wrote: >> >>> >>> The seems to have fixed it. >> > > Okay, thanks, committed. > > Your torn-page generator seems to be very good at fi

Re: [HACKERS] 9.4 checksum error in recovery with btree index

2014-05-19 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
On 05/18/2014 06:30 AM, Jeff Janes wrote: On Saturday, May 17, 2014, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: On 05/17/2014 12:28 AM, Jeff Janes wrote: More fun with my torn page injection test program on 9.4. 24171 2014-05-16 14:00:44.934 PDT:WARNING: 01000: page verification failed, calculated checksu

Re: [HACKERS] 9.4 checksum error in recovery with btree index

2014-05-17 Thread Jeff Janes
On Saturday, May 17, 2014, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 05/17/2014 12:28 AM, Jeff Janes wrote: > >> More fun with my torn page injection test program on 9.4. >> >> 24171 2014-05-16 14:00:44.934 PDT:WARNING: 01000: page verification >> failed, calculated checksum 21100 but expected 3356 >> 241

Re: [HACKERS] 9.4 checksum error in recovery with btree index

2014-05-17 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
On 05/17/2014 12:28 AM, Jeff Janes wrote: More fun with my torn page injection test program on 9.4. 24171 2014-05-16 14:00:44.934 PDT:WARNING: 01000: page verification failed, calculated checksum 21100 but expected 3356 24171 2014-05-16 14:00:44.934 PDT:CONTEXT: xlog redo split_l: rel 1663/1