Re: [HACKERS] A possible TODO item

2007-01-01 Thread Tom Lane
"Gurjeet Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I thought that if the author of the code (which, now I see, is you) No, it was Jan IIRC. >> And surely we are never going >> to make VACUUM force a complete REINDEX as the comment suggests. > In that case, can the comment be changed! Even though it'

Re: [HACKERS] A possible TODO item

2006-12-31 Thread Gurjeet Singh
On 12/31/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Gurjeet Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The comment above TOAST_INDEX_HACK in tuptoaster.h is: > /* > * This enables de-toasting of index entries. Needed until VACUUM is > * smart enough to rebuild indexes from scratch. > */ > #define T

Re: [HACKERS] A possible TODO item

2006-12-31 Thread Tom Lane
"Gurjeet Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The comment above TOAST_INDEX_HACK in tuptoaster.h is: > /* > * This enables de-toasting of index entries. Needed until VACUUM is > * smart enough to rebuild indexes from scratch. > */ > #define TOAST_INDEX_HACK > Do we already have a TODO item to