On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
But there's a bigger problem: it seems to me that we have an
inconsistency between what happens when you create an extension from
scratch and when you upgrade it from unpackaged. Both
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
The underlying issue here is whether objects dependent on an extension
member should have direct dependencies on the extension too, and if not,
how do we prevent that? The
I wrote:
Hmm. I'm afraid that's going to break something, because I had had it
like that originally and changed it in commit
988620dd8c16d77f88ede167b22056176324. However, I'm not quite sure
*what* it will break, because it seems like in general extension
dependencies ought to act
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
The underlying issue here is whether objects dependent on an extension
member should have direct dependencies on the extension too, and if not,
how do we prevent that? The
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
rhaas=# alter extension pg_stat_statements drop type pg_stat_statements[];
ERROR: syntax error at or near [
LINE 1: ...extension pg_stat_statements drop type pg_stat_statements[];
^
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
rhaas=# alter extension pg_stat_statements drop type pg_stat_statements[];
ERROR: syntax error at or near [
LINE 1: ...extension pg_stat_statements drop type pg_stat_statements[];
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
But there's a bigger problem: it seems to me that we have an
inconsistency between what happens when you create an extension from
scratch and when you upgrade it from unpackaged. Both pg_buffercache
and pg_stat_statements just do this in the upgrade
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
But there's a bigger problem: it seems to me that we have an
inconsistency between what happens when you create an extension from
scratch and when you upgrade it from unpackaged. Both
