Re: [HACKERS] Alpha2/Beta1

2015-07-22 Thread Josh Berkus
All:

Sounds like the overwhemling consensus is Alpha2 then.  Will run with it.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Alpha2/Beta1

2015-07-22 Thread Simon Riggs
On 21 July 2015 at 22:01, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:


 My question for Hackers is: should this be Alpha2 or Beta 1?


Alpha2

-- 
Simon Riggshttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
http://www.2ndquadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training  Services


Re: [HACKERS] Alpha2/Beta1

2015-07-22 Thread Etsuro Fujita

On 2015/07/22 12:40, Noah Misch wrote:

I vote for alpha2.  Comparing the Open Issues and resolved after 9.5alpha1
sections of https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items, we've
not transitioned to a qualitatively different level of API stability.


+1 for alpha2.

I'd like to propose a patch for the issue Foreign join pushdown vs 
EvalPlanQual, but I need more time ...


Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Alpha2/Beta1

2015-07-22 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Etsuro Fujita
fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
 On 2015/07/22 12:40, Noah Misch wrote:
 I vote for alpha2.  Comparing the Open Issues and resolved after
 9.5alpha1
 sections of https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items,
 we've
 not transitioned to a qualitatively different level of API stability.

 +1 for alpha2.

+1 for alpha2 from me as well.  We have made some progress but there
is an awful lot of stuff left to get fixed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Alpha2/Beta1

2015-07-21 Thread Noah Misch
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 02:01:57PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
 At the Developer's Meeting, we said we'd be releasing an alpha or beta
 each month until final 9.5 release.  As such, we should be releasing a
 9.5 alpha/beta in the first week of August.
 
 My question for Hackers is: should this be Alpha2 or Beta 1?

I vote for alpha2.  Comparing the Open Issues and resolved after 9.5alpha1
sections of https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items, we've
not transitioned to a qualitatively different level of API stability.

Thanks,
nm


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Alpha2/Beta1

2015-07-21 Thread Michael Paquier
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
 On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 02:01:57PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
 At the Developer's Meeting, we said we'd be releasing an alpha or beta
 each month until final 9.5 release.  As such, we should be releasing a
 9.5 alpha/beta in the first week of August.

 My question for Hackers is: should this be Alpha2 or Beta 1?

 I vote for alpha2.  Comparing the Open Issues and resolved after 9.5alpha1
 sections of https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items, we've
 not transitioned to a qualitatively different level of API stability.

Mine goes for alpha2. There are some issues remaining yet that require
low-level attention.
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Alpha2/Beta1

2015-07-21 Thread Gavin Flower

On 22/07/15 09:01, Josh Berkus wrote:
[...]


My question for Hackers is: should this be Alpha2 or Beta 1?



Yes!  :-)

(The decision, as to which, I'll leave to the REAL Developers.)

More seriously, I expect that the alpha probably generated a lot of 
useful feedback.  Was this actually the case?



Cheers,
Gavin



--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Alpha2/Beta1

2015-07-21 Thread Peter Geoghegan
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
 I vote for alpha2.  Comparing the Open Issues and resolved after 9.5alpha1
 sections of https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items, we've
 not transitioned to a qualitatively different level of API stability.

I agree. I'd hoped that my bugfixes would get committed in time for
what we were going to call Beta 1. Everyone qualified seems to be very
busy with other things that are more pressing.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers