On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 03:28:39PM -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
We're really rather overdue for updates of the pre-9.4 back branches,
and 9.4 itself has probably baked for long enough to justify a 9.4.1.
Accordingly, the
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
We're really rather overdue for updates of the pre-9.4 back branches,
and 9.4 itself has probably baked for long enough to justify a 9.4.1.
Accordingly, the core committee has agreed to wrap releases the week
after next;
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 03:28:39PM -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
We're really rather overdue for updates of the pre-9.4 back branches,
and 9.4 itself has probably baked for long enough to
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
So let's get on with it. We're not holding up releases for patches
that may or may not materialize.
I don't disagree. Just pointing out that it's a consideration.
--
Peter Geoghegan
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
