Re: [HACKERS] Block B-tree etc. (was Re: Introducing an advanced Frequent
Heikki, On 11/7/06 1:51 AM, "Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think Simon's proposal is meant to address that issue, but did > you follow the thread I started in September about Block B-Tree index: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-09/msg02041.php Aha - mystery solved - thanks for the clarification. Block Btree ~= Lossy Btree - Luke ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Re: [HACKERS] Block B-tree etc. (was Re: Introducing an advanced Frequent Update)
Luke, > That's our plan to achieve speedups that other DBMS's have achieved with > Index-Organized-Tables or Clustered Indexes. We're running initial > performance tests of it as we speak, and if all goes well we're hoping > to get that into PostgreSQL 8.3. Also, if the EDB folks weren't clear, the two proposals are meant to compliment each other. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
