I can set up build farm on it if yall need it. Its running 6.2/amd64
--- Original Message ---
From: "Andrew Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: " Larry Rosenman "
Sent: 2/8/07, 12:19:07 PM
Subject: Re: BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member?
On Jan 19 2006, 9:36 pm, [EMAIL PROT
On Jan 19 2006, 9:36 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Larry Rosenman") wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Larry Rosenman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> I've got a fastFreeBSD/amd64 server available to run Buildfarm
> >> on.
>
> >> However, I see we already have a couple of others running it.
>
> >>
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 07:16:03PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Larry Rosenman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I've got a fast FreeBSD/amd64 server available to run Buildfarm on.
>
> > However, I see we already have a couple of others running it.
>
> > My questions are:
> > 1) do we
"Larry Rosenman" writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Looks like we're fairly well covered on freebsd already. Are you
>> willing to consider running some less-popular OS on it?
> What were you thinking?
[ shrug... ] Anything you don't see paired with amd64 on the buildfarm
roster is OK by me ...
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Larry Rosenman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I've got a fast FreeBSD/amd64 server available to run Buildfarm
>> on.
>
>> However, I see we already have a couple of others running it.
>
>> My questions are:
>> 1) do we need another one?
>> 2) if yes, what
"Larry Rosenman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've got a fast FreeBSD/amd64 server available to run Buildfarm on.
> However, I see we already have a couple of others running it.
> My questions are:
> 1) do we need another one?
> 2) if yes, what options need coverage?
Looks l
