On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On 4/17/14, 9:38 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> But the ability to easily spin up temporary branches for testing would
>>also be great. Unfortunately, I suspect that only a minority of the
>>buildfarm owners would choose to participate, whi
On 4/17/14, 9:38 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
But the ability to easily spin up temporary branches for testing would
>>also be great. Unfortunately, I suspect that only a minority of the
>>buildfarm owners would choose to participate, which would make it less
>>useful, but if we could solve that problem
On 04/17/2014 10:38 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> IMO the best single thing that could happen for the buildfarm is if
> we had more critters (at least twice as many) running a wider variety of
> platforms, compilers, and configuration options than there are today.
> More frequent runs would come out of tha
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> On 04/17/2014 09:17 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> In terms of improving the buildfarm infrastructure, the thing I would
>> most like to have is more frequent runs.
IMO the best single thing that could happen for the buildfarm is if
we had more critters (at least twice as many
On 04/17/2014 09:17 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
In terms of improving the buildfarm infrastructure, the thing I would
most like to have is more frequent runs. It would be great if pushing
a commit to the master repository triggered an immediate build on
every buildfarm animal so that you could see
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 04/17/2014 12:08 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Amit Kapila
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Amit Kapila
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr
On 04/17/2014 12:08 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Amit Kapila
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Robert Haas
wrote:
> For the cr
