Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER loses nulls (was Re: [ADMIN] Still a bug in the VACUUM)

2003-03-02 Thread Tom Lane
Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> * Make CLUSTER error out if the target index is not of an 'amindexnulls' >> index AM. This would amount to restricting CLUSTER to b-trees, which is >> annoying. > I think this solution is fine - we just need to fix GiST to index nulls > one d

Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER loses nulls (was Re: [ADMIN] Still a bug in the VACUUM)

2003-03-02 Thread Tom Lane
Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm willing to do this: I can handle it (was already working on it, in fact). I had hoped to find someone who might want to do the more extensive fix, but erroring out is easy enough. > - Reject on partial or functional indexes > - Reject when first colum

Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER loses nulls (was Re: [ADMIN] Still a bug in the VACUUM)

2003-03-02 Thread Rod Taylor
> * Make CLUSTER error out if the target index is not of an 'amindexnulls' > index AM. This would amount to restricting CLUSTER to b-trees, which is > annoying. I'm willing to do this: - Reject on partial or functional indexes - Reject when first columns attnotnull is false and amindexnulls is