On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.comwrote:
Gurjeet Singh wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Gurjeet Singh gurj...@singh.im writes:
I was looking for ways to reduce the noise in Postgres make output,
Gurjeet Singh wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Gurjeet Singh gurj...@singh.im writes:
I was looking for ways to reduce the noise in Postgres make output,
specifically, I wanted to eliminate the Nothing to be done for `all'
messages, since
Gurjeet Singh gurj...@singh.im writes:
I was looking for ways to reduce the noise in Postgres make output,
specifically, I wanted to eliminate the Nothing to be done for `all'
messages, since they don't add much value, and just ad to the clutter.
Why don't you just use make -s if you don't
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Gurjeet Singh gurj...@singh.im writes:
I was looking for ways to reduce the noise in Postgres make output,
specifically, I wanted to eliminate the Nothing to be done for `all'
messages, since they don't add much value,
Tom Lane wrote:
I'm pretty suspicious of cute changes like this to the makefiles.
They too often have unexpected side-effects. (I'm still pissed off
about having to manually remove objfiles.txt to get it to rebuild a .o
file, for instance.)
Yeah, I've been bitten by that as well and I don't
On 11/26/13, 1:36 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
A patch to use non-recursive make to construct the backend would be very
much appreciated. We've talked about it at least two times, but no one
seems interested enough to put in the effort.
References?
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 11/26/13, 1:36 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
A patch to use non-recursive make to construct the backend would be very
much appreciated. We've talked about it at least two times, but no one
seems interested enough to put in the effort.
References?
What, you want
