Re: [HACKERS] Clustering Docs WAS: Mammoth in Core?

2010-01-27 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Greg Smith wrote: We've got pgsql-cluster-hackers to discuss this particular area. Huh, is this a new list? It wasn't added to wwwmaster's list of lists, apparently, right? -- Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command

Re: [HACKERS] Clustering Docs WAS: Mammoth in Core?

2010-01-27 Thread Greg Smith
Alvaro Herrera wrote: Greg Smith wrote: We've got pgsql-cluster-hackers to discuss this particular area. Huh, is this a new list? It wasn't added to wwwmaster's list of lists, apparently, right? The archives are at http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-cluster-hackers/ but it's

Re: [HACKERS] Clustering Docs WAS: Mammoth in Core?

2010-01-27 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Greg Smith wrote: Alvaro Herrera wrote: Greg Smith wrote: We've got pgsql-cluster-hackers to discuss this particular area. Huh, is this a new list? It wasn't added to wwwmaster's list of lists, apparently, right? The archives are at

Re: [HACKERS] Clustering Docs WAS: Mammoth in Core?

2010-01-27 Thread Greg Smith
Alvaro Herrera wrote: Greg Smith wrote: Alvaro Herrera wrote: Greg Smith wrote: We've got pgsql-cluster-hackers to discuss this particular area. Huh, is this a new list? It wasn't added to wwwmaster's list of lists, apparently, right? The archives are at

Re: [HACKERS] Clustering Docs WAS: Mammoth in Core?

2010-01-27 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Greg Smith wrote: Alvaro Herrera wrote: Greg Smith wrote: The archives are at http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-cluster-hackers/ but it's not listed at http://archives.postgresql.org/ for some reason. Because it wasn't added to the database. It seems we've gotten sloppy about the

Re: [HACKERS] Clustering Docs WAS: Mammoth in Core?

2010-01-25 Thread Josh Berkus
All, Please rename this thread. I think that several people to whom it's relevant aren't replying to it because of the deceptive name. Thanks. --Josh -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription:

Re: [HACKERS] Clustering Docs WAS: Mammoth in Core?

2010-01-25 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 10:50 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: All, Please rename this thread. I think that several people to whom it's relevant aren't replying to it because of the deceptive name. Thanks. Except that it is. This thread was about whether or not, Mammoth would be considered to be

Re: [HACKERS] Clustering Docs WAS: Mammoth in Core?

2010-01-25 Thread Greg Smith
Joshua D. Drake wrote: My suggestion would be to start a new thread entirely. And mine would be to drop this whole topic altogether until after the CommitFest is over, and instead focus on the replication features already committed that need work before beta can even start. Only reason