Re: [HACKERS] Clustering Docs WAS: Mammoth in Core?

2010-01-27 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Greg Smith wrote:

 We've got pgsql-cluster-hackers to discuss this
 particular area.

Huh, is this a new list?  It wasn't added to wwwmaster's list of lists,
apparently, right?

-- 
Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Clustering Docs WAS: Mammoth in Core?

2010-01-27 Thread Greg Smith

Alvaro Herrera wrote:

Greg Smith wrote:

  

We've got pgsql-cluster-hackers to discuss this
particular area.



Huh, is this a new list?  It wasn't added to wwwmaster's list of lists,
apparently, right?
  


The archives are at 
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-cluster-hackers/ but it's not 
listed at http://archives.postgresql.org/ for some reason.


--
Greg Smith2ndQuadrant   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
g...@2ndquadrant.com  www.2ndQuadrant.com


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Clustering Docs WAS: Mammoth in Core?

2010-01-27 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Greg Smith wrote:
 Alvaro Herrera wrote:
 Greg Smith wrote:
 
 We've got pgsql-cluster-hackers to discuss this
 particular area.
 
 Huh, is this a new list?  It wasn't added to wwwmaster's list of lists,
 apparently, right?
 
 The archives are at
 http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-cluster-hackers/ but it's not
 listed at http://archives.postgresql.org/ for some reason.

Because it wasn't added to the database.  It seems we've gotten sloppy
about the list creation process (though I admit it doesn't seem to be
documented anywhere).

If you give me a description for the list I'll add it.

-- 
Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Clustering Docs WAS: Mammoth in Core?

2010-01-27 Thread Greg Smith

Alvaro Herrera wrote:

Greg Smith wrote:
  

Alvaro Herrera wrote:


Greg Smith wrote:

  

We've got pgsql-cluster-hackers to discuss this
particular area.


Huh, is this a new list?  It wasn't added to wwwmaster's list of lists,
apparently, right?
  

The archives are at
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-cluster-hackers/ but it's not
listed at http://archives.postgresql.org/ for some reason.



Because it wasn't added to the database.  It seems we've gotten sloppy
about the list creation process (though I admit it doesn't seem to be
documented anywhere).

If you give me a description for the list I'll add it.
  


Discussion of adding replication and clustering features to PostgreSQL, 
both inside the database and via integration with additional software.


--
Greg Smith2ndQuadrant   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
g...@2ndquadrant.com  www.2ndQuadrant.com


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Clustering Docs WAS: Mammoth in Core?

2010-01-27 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Greg Smith wrote:
 Alvaro Herrera wrote:
 Greg Smith wrote:

 The archives are at
 http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-cluster-hackers/ but it's not
 listed at http://archives.postgresql.org/ for some reason.
 
 Because it wasn't added to the database.  It seems we've gotten sloppy
 about the list creation process (though I admit it doesn't seem to be
 documented anywhere).
 
 If you give me a description for the list I'll add it.
 
 Discussion of adding replication and clustering features to
 PostgreSQL, both inside the database and via integration with
 additional software.

Added, thanks.

-- 
Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Clustering Docs WAS: Mammoth in Core?

2010-01-25 Thread Josh Berkus
All,

Please rename this thread.  I think that several people to whom it's
relevant aren't replying to it because of the deceptive name.  Thanks.

--Josh


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Clustering Docs WAS: Mammoth in Core?

2010-01-25 Thread Joshua D. Drake
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 10:50 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
 All,
 
 Please rename this thread.  I think that several people to whom it's
 relevant aren't replying to it because of the deceptive name.  Thanks.
 

Except that it is. This thread was about whether or not, Mammoth would
be considered to be in core. Which is fairly independent of the
clustering docs.

My suggestion would be to start a new thread entirely.

Joshua D. Drake


 --Josh
 


-- 
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
Respect is earned, not gained through arbitrary and repetitive use or Mr. or 
Sir.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Clustering Docs WAS: Mammoth in Core?

2010-01-25 Thread Greg Smith

Joshua D. Drake wrote:

My suggestion would be to start a new thread entirely.
  


And mine would be to drop this whole topic altogether until after the 
CommitFest is over, and instead focus on the replication features 
already committed that need work before beta can even start.  Only 
reason I said something is that I objected to the idea that the 
information on the wiki was complete enough to be considered a roadmap 
for others to follow in this area and wanted to clarify that it 
wasn't--it's helpful, but everybody knows it still needs work yet.  
Actually improving things enough that it is, that work I think is well 
outside of what this list should be focusing on right now.  We've got 
pgsql-cluster-hackers to discuss this particular area.


--
Greg Smith2ndQuadrant   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
g...@2ndquadrant.com  www.2ndQuadrant.com


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers