On 8/10/07, Decibel! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 08:08:55AM +0300, Adrian Maier wrote:
So it looks like this is simply a known issue that hasn't been backpatched.
I'll simply use 8.2 .
Ok, I'll bite... if you can use 8.2, why were you trying with 7.4
instead? It sounds
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 08:08:55AM +0300, Adrian Maier wrote:
So it looks like this is simply a known issue that hasn't been backpatched.
I'll simply use 8.2 .
Ok, I'll bite... if you can use 8.2, why were you trying with 7.4
instead? It sounds like you're paying new-car-prices for something
Adrian Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have just tried to compile postgresql 7.4.17 on a HP-UX 11.11 box
(PA-RISC) and the compliation fails in gist.
I do not think anyone cares about making 7.4.x run on platforms it did
not support before. Use a newer PG release.
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 11:46:47AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Adrian Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have just tried to compile postgresql 7.4.17 on a HP-UX 11.11 box
(PA-RISC) and the compliation fails in gist.
I do not think anyone cares about making 7.4.x run on platforms it did
not
On 8/10/07, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Decibel! [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 11:46:47AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Adrian Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have just tried to compile postgresql 7.4.17 on a HP-UX 11.11 box
(PA-RISC) and the compliation fails in
Adrian Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 8/10/07, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ digs around a bit... ] However, I might have been right for the
wrong reasons. I'm thinking Adrian is trying to build for 64-bit
HPPA (a beast the 7.4 supported-platforms matrix doesn't know about),
and
