Re: [HACKERS] Compile failure with SSL

2004-06-25 Thread Tom Lane
Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: OK, looks like the error below is a Win32 thing. The patch attached #ifdef'd out the permissions check on the private key file as it won't work under Windows anyway (a similar check in postmaster.c has has already been ifdef'd out for the same reason).

Re: [HACKERS] Compile failure with SSL

2004-06-22 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Merlin Moncure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2004 15:40 To: Dave Page Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Compile failure with SSL I had made the same changes as you to be_secure...(actually, I recently stopped

Re: [HACKERS] Compile failure with SSL

2004-06-21 Thread Merlin Moncure
Dave Page wrote: OK, looks like the error below is a Win32 thing. The patch attached #ifdef'd out the permissions check on the private key file as it won't work under Windows anyway (a similar check in postmaster.c has has already been ifdef'd out for the same reason). Incidently, the

Re: [HACKERS] Compile failure with SSL

2004-06-20 Thread Dave Page
OK, looks like the error below is a Win32 thing. The patch attached #ifdef'd out the permissions check on the private key file as it won't work under Windows anyway (a similar check in postmaster.c has has already been ifdef'd out for the same reason). Incidently, the consts are also used in