Tom,
"If you insist on allowing domains in argument lists, then I think the best
approach is this: For purpose of function resolution, types and all
domains defined over them are equivalent. That would mean, for example,
that if you define positive_int as domain over int, then you cannot define
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> Admittedly, we have trouble resolving the type to use when a function is
>> overloaded with both a domain and a base type, but that's hardly
>> surprising.
> Even if you try to work it out, it's going to be a mess. During
> resolu
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The SQL standard does not allow functions to have domains as arguments.
> Semantically, they have a point.
I don't think they do. Declaring a domain as the input type seems a
very natural way of asserting that the function only works over a subset
of
