Peter Geoghegan writes:
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6:19 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
> wrote:
>> That's sad news, as I expected ICU to bring its various collation features
>> to PostgreSQL. I hope it will be easy to add them.
> The reason it is not easy is that text equality is based on strict
> bina
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6:19 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
wrote:
> From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org
>> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut
>> There are no case-insensitive collations in PostgreSQL (yet).
>
> That's sad news, as I expected ICU to bring its va
From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut
> There are no case-insensitive collations in PostgreSQL (yet).
That's sad news, as I expected ICU to bring its various collation features to
PostgreSQL. I hope it will be easy to
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 5:38 AM, MauMau wrote:
> I tried to find a particular collation name in pg_collation, but I
> cannot understand the naming convention after reading the following
> article. Specifically, I want to find out whether there is some
> collation equivalent to Japanese_CI_AS in SQ
On 8/9/17 08:38, MauMau wrote:
> I tried to find a particular collation name in pg_collation, but I
> cannot understand the naming convention after reading the following
> article. Specifically, I want to find out whether there is some
> collation equivalent to Japanese_CI_AS in SQL Server, which
