Re: [HACKERS] How huge does mvtest_huge need to be?

On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > At this point I'm inclined to just delete the whole test. ok -- Kevin Grittner VMware vCenter Server https://www.vmware.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your

Re: [HACKERS] How huge does mvtest_huge need to be?

I wrote: > Kevin Grittner writes: >> Hm. This seems like a particularly useless size. It would test a >> possibly useful corner case if it was over 10MB so that it was over >> vacuum's truncation threshold, but that would obviously be even >> slower. It doesn't seem

Re: [HACKERS] How huge does mvtest_huge need to be?

Kevin Grittner writes: > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> So ... is there a good reason to be using a large table here, and >> if so what is it, and how big does the table really need to be >> to provide useful test coverage? > Hm. This

Re: [HACKERS] How huge does mvtest_huge need to be?

On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > So ... is there a good reason to be using a large table here, and > if so what is it, and how big does the table really need to be > to provide useful test coverage? Hm. This seems like a particularly useless size. It