Re: [HACKERS] Improve OOM handling in pg_locale.c

2016-11-21 Thread Tom Lane
Mithun Cy  writes:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Michael Paquier 
> wrote:
>> I am attaching that to the next CF.

> One thing which you might need to reconsider is removal of memory leak
> comments. There is still a leak if there is an error while encoding in
> db_encoding_strdup.
> Unless you want to catch those error with an TRY();CATCH(); and then
> free the mem.

I could have lived with leaving the leak there, but really this wasn't
fixing the worst problem with the code: if it did throw an error out of
the middle of that sequence, it would leave the process setlocale'd to
some other locale than we want.  That could lead to unwanted behavior
in printf and other functions.  And this isn't all that unlikely: an
encoding conversion failure is definitely possible if you have a locale
selected that's not compatible with the database encoding.

I whacked the patch around enough so that we didn't do anything except
libc calls between setting and restoring the locale.  At that point it
was just a matter of adding a TRY block to be able to say that we
didn't leak any strdup'd strings, so I figured "might as well".

Pushed with those changes.

regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Improve OOM handling in pg_locale.c

2016-11-21 Thread Michael Paquier
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Tom Lane  wrote:
> I could have lived with leaving the leak there, but really this wasn't
> fixing the worst problem with the code: if it did throw an error out of
> the middle of that sequence, it would leave the process setlocale'd to
> some other locale than we want.  That could lead to unwanted behavior
> in printf and other functions.  And this isn't all that unlikely: an
> encoding conversion failure is definitely possible if you have a locale
> selected that's not compatible with the database encoding.
>
> I whacked the patch around enough so that we didn't do anything except
> libc calls between setting and restoring the locale.  At that point it
> was just a matter of adding a TRY block to be able to say that we
> didn't leak any strdup'd strings, so I figured "might as well".
>
> Pushed with those changes.

Thanks. The changes you have done look good to me at short sight.
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Improve OOM handling in pg_locale.c

2016-11-16 Thread Mithun Cy
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Michael Paquier 
wrote:
> I am attaching that to the next CF.

I have tested this patch. Now we error out as OOM instead of crash.

postgres=# SELECT '12.34'::money;
ERROR:  out of memory
LINE 1: SELECT '12.34'::money;


One thing which you might need to reconsider is removal of memory leak
comments. There is still a leak if there is an error while encoding in
db_encoding_strdup.
Unless you want to catch those error with an TRY();CATCH(); and then
free the mem.

-* localeconv()'s results.  Note that if we were to fail within this
-* sequence before reaching "CurrentLocaleConvAllocated = true", we 
could
-* leak some memory --- but not much, so it's not worth agonizing over.

Rest all LGTM.
-- 
Thanks and Regards
Mithun C Y
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com


Re: [HACKERS] Improve OOM handling in pg_locale.c

2016-11-16 Thread Haribabu Kommi
Hi Mithun,

This is a gentle reminder.

you assigned as reviewer to the current patch in the 11-2016 commitfest.
But you haven't shared your review yet. Can you please try to share your
views
about the patch. This will help us in smoother operation of commitfest.

Please Ignore if you already shared your review.

Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia