Re: [HACKERS] Improving PL/PgSQL

2014-09-07 Thread Marko Tiikkaja
On 2014-09-06 9:47 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: -1 .. to proposal .. It is in contradiction with current feature. Which feature would that be? Next it is nonsense. INTO clause should to contains only plpgsql variables - in 9.x Postgres there is not possible issue. postgres=# create table x(a

Re: [HACKERS] Improving PL/PgSQL

2014-09-06 Thread Jan Wieck
On 09/06/2014 02:08 PM, Marko Tiikkaja wrote: On 2014-09-06 7:56 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: 2014-09-06 19:54 GMT+02:00 Marko Tiikkaja ma...@joh.to: Then that doesn't really solve our problem. Switching between two languages on a per-function basis, when both look exactly the same but have very

Re: [HACKERS] Improving PL/PgSQL (was: Re: plpgsql defensive mode)

2014-09-06 Thread Pavel Stehule
2014-09-06 20:08 GMT+02:00 Marko Tiikkaja ma...@joh.to: On 2014-09-06 7:56 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: 2014-09-06 19:54 GMT+02:00 Marko Tiikkaja ma...@joh.to: Then that doesn't really solve our problem. Switching between two languages on a per-function basis, when both look exactly the same

Re: [HACKERS] Improving PL/PgSQL (was: Re: plpgsql defensive mode)

2014-09-06 Thread Pavel Stehule
2014-09-06 21:47 GMT+02:00 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com: 2014-09-06 20:08 GMT+02:00 Marko Tiikkaja ma...@joh.to: On 2014-09-06 7:56 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: 2014-09-06 19:54 GMT+02:00 Marko Tiikkaja ma...@joh.to: Then that doesn't really solve our problem. Switching between