Re: [HACKERS] Incorrect mentions to pg_xlog in walmethods.c/h

2017-07-04 Thread Michael Paquier 
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Ryan Murphy  wrote:
> The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
> make installcheck-world:  not tested
> Implements feature:   not tested
> Spec compliant:   not tested
> Documentation:not tested
>
> This commit only affects comments, so I'm confident it doesn't break code, 
> though I did not run the tests.
>
> I understand that the pg_xlog directory was renamed to pg_wal (confirmed that 
> this is in the changelog too), so the comment changes seem correct.
>
> I am marking this Ready for Committer.
>
> The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer

Thanks for the update. This has been already committed though as of 4260c05.
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] Incorrect mentions to pg_xlog in walmethods.c/h

2017-07-04 Thread Ryan Murphy 
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world:  not tested
Implements feature:   not tested
Spec compliant:   not tested
Documentation:not tested

This commit only affects comments, so I'm confident it doesn't break code, 
though I did not run the tests.

I understand that the pg_xlog directory was renamed to pg_wal (confirmed that 
this is in the changelog too), so the comment changes seem correct.

I am marking this Ready for Committer.

The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] Incorrect mentions to pg_xlog in walmethods.c/h

2017-06-30 Thread Michael Paquier 
On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 3:41 AM, Peter Eisentraut
 wrote:
> On 6/27/17 01:26, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> I have noticed $subject. A patch is attached. Those comments are not
>> completely wrong either as pg_basebackup can generate pg_xlog as well,
>> still I would recommend to just mention "pg_wal".
>
> committed

Thanks.
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] Incorrect mentions to pg_xlog in walmethods.c/h

2017-06-30 Thread Peter Eisentraut 
On 6/27/17 01:26, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I have noticed $subject. A patch is attached. Those comments are not
> completely wrong either as pg_basebackup can generate pg_xlog as well,
> still I would recommend to just mention "pg_wal".

committed

-- 
Peter Eisentraut  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers