On 03/02/2015 12:43 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 02/27/2015 04:19 PM, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
I add MemoryContext listCxt to avoid memory leak. listCxt is created once
in gistrescan (only for index-only scan plan ) and reseted when scan of the
leaf page is finished.
I do not sure if
On 02/27/2015 04:19 PM, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
I add MemoryContext listCxt to avoid memory leak. listCxt is created once
in gistrescan (only for index-only scan plan ) and reseted when scan of the
leaf page is finished.
I do not sure if the problem was completely solved, so I wait for
I add MemoryContext listCxt to avoid memory leak. listCxt is created once
in gistrescan (only for index-only scan plan ) and reseted when scan of the
leaf page is finished.
I do not sure if the problem was completely solved, so I wait for feedback.
* What's the reason for turning
Thanks for answer.
Now it seems to be applied correctly.
2015-02-12 3:12 GMT+04:00 Thom Brown t...@linux.com:
On 11 February 2015 at 22:50, Anastasia Lubennikova
lubennikov...@gmail.com wrote:
Finally there is a new version of patch (in attachments).
It provides multicolumn index-only scan
On 12 February 2015 at 10:40, Anastasia Lubennikova lubennikov...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks for answer.
Now it seems to be applied correctly.
(please avoid top-posting)
Thanks for the updated patch. I can confirm that it now cleanly applies
and compiles fine. I've run the tested in the SQL
On 12 February 2015 at 16:40, Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com
wrote:
On 02/12/2015 12:40 PM, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
Thanks for answer.
Now it seems to be applied correctly.
* Documentation is missing.
Anastasia provided a documentation patch in the first email.
Thom
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 12 February 2015 at 16:40, Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com
wrote:
On 02/12/2015 12:40 PM, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
Thanks for answer.
Now it seems to be applied correctly.
* Documentation is missing.
On 02/12/2015 12:40 PM, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
Thanks for answer.
Now it seems to be applied correctly.
Thanks, it would be great to get this completed.
This still leaks memory with the same test query as earlier. The leak
seems to be into a different memory context now; it used to be
On 11 February 2015 at 22:50, Anastasia Lubennikova lubennikov...@gmail.com
wrote:
Finally there is a new version of patch (in attachments).
It provides multicolumn index-only scan for GiST indexes.
- Memory leak is fixed.
- little code cleanup
- example of performance test in attachmens
On 18 August 2014 09:05, Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
On 08/17/2014 07:15 PM, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
2014-08-07 0:30 GMT+04:00 Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com:
* I'm getting two regression failures with this (opr_sanity and join).
opr_sanity failure
Updated patch
* Compiler, merge and regression fails checked
* Regression tests was impoved
* GiST and amcanreturn docs updated
--
Best regards,
Lubennikova Anastasia
indexonlyscan_gist2.patch
Description: Binary data
indexonlyscan_gist_docs.patch
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via
On 08/17/2014 07:15 PM, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
2014-08-07 0:30 GMT+04:00 Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com:
* I'm getting two regression failures with this (opr_sanity and join).
opr_sanity failure is corrected.
But there is remain question with join.
I check the latest
2014-08-07 0:30 GMT+04:00 Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com:
* I'm getting two regression failures with this (opr_sanity and join).
opr_sanity failure is corrected.
But there is remain question with join.
I check the latest version of my github repo and there's no fail in join
On 08/01/2014 10:58 AM, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
Hi, hackers!
I work on a GSoC project Index-only scans for GIST
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Support_for_Index-only_scans_for_GIST_GSoC_2014
Repository is
https://github.com/lubennikovaav/postgres/tree/indexonlygist2
Patch is in
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 4:58 AM, Anastasia Lubennikova
lubennikov...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, hackers!
I work on a GSoC project Index-only scans for GIST
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Support_for_Index-only_scans_for_GIST_GSoC_2014
Repository is
Thank you for comment
Patch is already added in Performance topic.
2014-08-01 20:25 GMT+04:00 Fabrízio de Royes Mello fabriziome...@gmail.com
:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 4:58 AM, Anastasia Lubennikova
lubennikov...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, hackers!
I work on a GSoC project Index-only scans
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Anastasia Lubennikova
lubennikov...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, hackers!
There are first results of my work on GSoC project Index-only scans for
GIST.
Cool.
1. Version of my project code is in forked repository
17 matches
Mail list logo