There's been work on it. Theodor cleaned it up for HEAD and looked at
adding GiST support. I beleive he's waiting for 8.2 to release.
Yep, I have bundle of patches and I'm waiting for 8.2 branch split out of HEAD.
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Pierre Pelletier
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Reply-To: Martijn van Oosterhout
To: JEAN-PIERRE PELLETIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Index ignored with "is not distinct from", 8.2 beta2
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 200
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 02:12:29PM -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> I assume you're referring to
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-09/msg00083.php ?
>
> I'm curious as to the status of that patch... presumably it never made
> it into the queue, but I'm not sure why since you seemed t
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 11:03:42AM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:10:40PM -0500, JEAN-PIERRE PELLETIER wrote:
> > I understand that the planner doesn't use indexes for IS NOT DISTINCT FROM,
> > but it would
> > be good because "is not distinct from" is very usefu
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:10:40PM -0500, JEAN-PIERRE PELLETIER wrote:
> I understand that the planner doesn't use indexes for IS NOT DISTINCT FROM,
> but it would
> be good because "is not distinct from" is very useful when you have nulls
> but don't want to use three value logic.
The main issu
E PELLETIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Index ignored with "is not distinct from", 8.2 beta2
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 16:02:40 -0600
One issue is that I'm not sure think you've got your sugar quite right.
Have you tested with:
One issue is that I'm not sure think you've got your sugar quite right.
Have you tested with:
(col IS NOT NULL AND 123 IS NOT NULL AND col = 123) OR
(col IS NULL and 123 IS NULL) ?
It's possible that the planner doesn't know about using an index for
DISTINCT; or it might just want an index th
