OK, removed.
---
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Simon intended to commit this per
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-03/msg01761.php
> (actually, there was a change in what was being done). I suspect this
> item isn'
Simon intended to commit this per
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-03/msg01761.php
(actually, there was a change in what was being done). I suspect this
item isn't valid any longer.
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 07:30:58PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> This has been saved for the 8.4
This has been saved for the 8.4 release:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
---
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 11:47 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 11:47 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 11:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> It strikes me that allowing archive_command to be changed on the fly
> > >> might not be such a good idea though, or
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 11:47 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 11:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> It strikes me that allowing archive_command to be changed on the fly
> > >> might not be such a good idea though, or
Where is this patch?
---
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 11:47 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 11:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> It strikes me tha
"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 04:57:18PM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> It's certainly a quicker fix. Unless others object, I'll set
>> archive_command to only be changeable at server startup.
> I think the docs should also explain why it's server-start only, s
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 04:57:18PM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 11:47 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 11:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> It strikes me that allowing archive_command to be changed on the fly
> > >>
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 11:47 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 11:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> It strikes me that allowing archive_command to be changed on the fly
> >> might not be such a good idea though, or at least it shouldn't be
> >>
