On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-09-03 09:31:50 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Andres Freund
>> wrote:
>> > We have pg_get_serial_sequence() mapping (relation, colum) to the
>> > sequence. What I'm missing right now is the inverse. I.
On 2014-09-03 09:31:50 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > We have pg_get_serial_sequence() mapping (relation, colum) to the
> > sequence. What I'm missing right now is the inverse. I.e. given a
> > sequence tell me the owner.
> > describe.c has a
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> We have pg_get_serial_sequence() mapping (relation, colum) to the
> sequence. What I'm missing right now is the inverse. I.e. given a
> sequence tell me the owner.
> describe.c has a query for that, and it's not too hard to write, but it
> st
Andres Freund-3 wrote
> On 2014-08-29 17:55:38 -0700, David G Johnston wrote:
>> Andres Freund-3 wrote
>
>>
>> pg_get_sequence_ownedby(...)
>
> My problem is that that possibly be confused with the user owning the
> sequence :/
Though as soon as that person reads the output their misunderstandi
On 2014-08-29 17:55:38 -0700, David G Johnston wrote:
> Andres Freund-3 wrote
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have pg_get_serial_sequence() mapping (relation, colum) to the
> > sequence. What I'm missing right now is the inverse. I.e. given a
> > sequence tell me the owner.
> > describe.c has a query for that,
Andres Freund-3 wrote
> Hi,
>
> We have pg_get_serial_sequence() mapping (relation, colum) to the
> sequence. What I'm missing right now is the inverse. I.e. given a
> sequence tell me the owner.
> describe.c has a query for that, and it's not too hard to write, but it
> still seems 'unfriendly' n
