Re: [HACKERS] Lack of RelabelType is causing me pain
Tom Lane wrote:
Joe, do you recall the reasoning for this code in parse_coerce.c?
if (targetTypeId == ANYOID ||
targetTypeId == ANYARRAYOID ||
targetTypeId == ANYELEMENTOID)
{
/* assume can_coerce_type verified that implicit coercion is okay */
/* NB: we do NOT want a RelabelType here */
return node;
}
I see this in REL7_3_STABLE
else if (targetTypeId == ANYOID ||
targetTypeId == ANYARRAYOID)
{
/* assume can_coerce_type verified that implicit coercion is okay */
/* NB: we do NOT want a RelabelType here */
result = node;
}
This was introduced here:
--
Revision 2.80 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs] , Thu Aug 22
00:01:42 2002 UTC (14 months, 2 weeks ago) by tgl
Changes since 2.79: +42 -19 lines
Diff to previous 2.79
Add a bunch of pseudo-types to replace the behavior formerly associated
with OPAQUE, as per recent pghackers discussion. I still want to do
some more work on the 'cstring' pseudo-type, but I'm going to commit the
bulk of the changes now before the tree starts shifting under me ...
--
I think I just followed suit when adding ANYELEMENTOID.
This is AFAICT the only case where the parser will generate an
expression tree that is not labeled with the same datatype expected
by the next-higher operator. That is precisely the sort of mismatch
that RelabelType was invented to avoid, and I'm afraid that we have
broken some things by regressing on the explicit representation of
type coercions.
The particular case that is causing me pain right now is that in my
modified tree with support for cross-datatype index operations, cases
involving anyarray_ops indexes are blowing up. That's because the
visible input type of an indexed comparison isn't matching the declared
righthand input type of any operator in the opclass. But RelabelType
was put in to avoid a number of other problems that I can't recall in
detail, so I am suspicious that this shortcut breaks other things too.
I think that the reason we did this was to allow get_fn_expr_argtype()
to see the unrelabeled datatype of the input to an anyarray/anyelement-
accepting function. Couldn't we fix that locally in that function
instead of breaking a system-wide convention? I'm thinking that we
could simply make that function burrow down through any RelabelTypes
for any/anyarray/anyelement.
Does the RelabelType keep a record of what was relabeled (I presume from
your description above it does)? The original code above predates
get_fn_expr_argtype() I think, but it sounds like a reasonable approach
to me.
Joe
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
Re: [HACKERS] Lack of RelabelType is causing me pain
Joe Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: Joe, do you recall the reasoning for this code in parse_coerce.c? [much snipped] Does the RelabelType keep a record of what was relabeled (I presume from your description above it does)? The RelabelType node itself doesn't, but you can look to its input node to see the initial type. The code I was imagining adding to get_fn_expr_argtype would go like while (node is a RelabelType with output ANYELEMENT/ANYARRAY/ANY) node := node-input; to chain down to the first thing that isn't a Relabel. You can see examples of this coding pattern in various places in the optimizer that want to ignore binary-compatible relabelings. The original code above predates get_fn_expr_argtype() I think, Oh, okay, if the coding predates 7.4 then I'm not so concerned about it. I was afraid we'd done this as of 7.4, in which case there's no field experience to indicate that it's really safe in corner cases. I have found a workaround for my immediate problem with indexing behavior, so I think we can leave parse_coerce.c as-is for the moment, but I'm planning to keep my eyes open for any evidence that we ought to reconsider the decision to omit RelabelType here. When RelabelType was put in, the intention was that it would appear *anywhere* that the actual output of one expression didn't match the expected input type of its parent. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
