On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 07:16:19PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's important to get the *right* interface into the first release
that has it.
Agreed, that's why I proposed the right interface to begin with :-)
Maybe
Way too late for 8.3 --- if we were going to do something like this,
we should think first and program later. In particular, blindly
adopting the sprintf format string definition doesn't seem very helpful.
The sorts of escapes I'd want to have are properly quoted SQL
identifier, properly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2) It's important to get the interface into a near-future release so
that client applications can start using it soon.
It's important to get the *right* interface into the first release
that has it. The day before feature freeze is way too late for
blue-sky design
It's important to get the *right* interface into the first release
that has it.
Agreed, that's why I proposed the right interface to begin with :-)
The day before feature freeze is way too late for
blue-sky design IMHO.
Ok, I can certainly bring this up again in the next release cycle.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I note that the nominal schedule
http://www.postgresql.org/developer/roadmap
says that all major proposals should have been made and reviewed at
least a month ago.
Consider me spanked... (and quit giggling Bruce).
Awe, you got me. :-)
FYI, I sung Dream On
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's important to get the *right* interface into the first release
that has it.
Agreed, that's why I proposed the right interface to begin with :-)
Maybe the first thing we might usefully do would be to document
PQExpBuffer. And you can send in a patch for
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's important to get the *right* interface into the first release
that has it.
Agreed, that's why I proposed the right interface to begin with :-)
Maybe the first thing we might usefully do would be to document
PQExpBuffer.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's important to get the *right* interface into the first release
that has it.
Agreed, that's why I proposed the right interface to begin with :-)
I don't necessarily object to PQexecf() as a shortcut for some
multi-step operation, but I don't think you've got the