Re: [HACKERS] Make getrusage() output a little more readable

[Peter Geoghegan]

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Peter Eisentraut
 wrote:
> The getrusage() output that is shown by VACUUM VERBOSE and other places
> has always been a little too terse and confusing for me.  I propose to
> improve that a bit:
>
> -CPU 0.01s/0.08u sec elapsed 0.18 sec.
> +CPU: user: 0.08s, system: 0.01s, elapsed: 0.18s.

I look at trace_sort output a lot, and do agree that this is confusing. +1.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] Make getrusage() output a little more readable

[Robert Haas]

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Peter Eisentraut
 wrote:
> The getrusage() output that is shown by VACUUM VERBOSE and other places
> has always been a little too terse and confusing for me.  I propose to
> improve that a bit:
>
> -CPU 0.01s/0.08u sec elapsed 0.18 sec.
> +CPU: user: 0.08s, system: 0.01s, elapsed: 0.18s.
>
> Patch attached.
>
> I have also updated the ShowUsage() output used by log_parser_stats etc.
> to match this change, but I don't claim that that output is particularly
> readable either way.
>
> While updating the VACUUM man page I noticed that the example output
> doesn't match exactly anymore, but I didn't do anything about that in
> this patch, just changed the lines that are affected by this patch.

+1 for this change.

I have reviewed the patch and it seems fine.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers