Jamie Fox wrote:
I regret that as a part-timer recently brought back on here I didn't
get an opportunity to test this earlier. The upgrade with the patch
worked fine on my first attempt.
Great. Thanks for the report, and sorry for the bug.
I regret that as a part-timer recently brought back on here I didn't
get an opportunity to test this earlier. The upgrade with the patch
worked fine on my first attempt.
Thanks again,
Jamie
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Jamie Fox wrote:
Thanks, I'm
On tis, 2011-09-27 at 16:19 -0700, Jamie Fox wrote:
It fails at this stage:
Restoring user relation files
linking /data/pgsql/prod-84/base/11564/2613 to
/data/pgsql/prod-91/base/12698/12570
linking /data/pgsql/prod-84/base/11564/2683 to
/data/pgsql/prod-91/base/12698/12572
Thanks, I'm following the thread pg_upgrade automatic testing and
will try the patch just detailed there.
Jamie
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On tis, 2011-09-27 at 16:19 -0700, Jamie Fox wrote:
It fails at this stage:
Restoring user relation
Jamie Fox wrote:
Thanks, I'm following the thread pg_upgrade automatic testing and
will try the patch just detailed there.
I have applied the patch to head and 9.1.X. We still have a win32 bug
to fix. It is a shame I was not able to fix these before 9.1.1 was
released. :-(
