Re: [HACKERS] NTA access on Solaris

2007-03-06 Thread Sherry Moore
On a 1P system system with 512K L2, it is more obvious why we shouldn't bypass L2 for small reads: The same readtest as my previous mail invoked as following: ./readtest -s working-set-size -f /platform/i86pc/boot_archive -n 100 With copyout_max_cached being 128K: Working set 16K 32

Re: [HACKERS] NTA access on Solaris

2007-03-06 Thread Sherry Moore
> With copyout_max_cached being 8K: ^^^ 4K > Working > set 16K 32K 64K 128K256K512K1M 2M 128M > > Seconds 4.8