Hello.
You wrote:
TL Pavel Golub pa...@microolap.com writes:
Is there any possibility that Postgres will have named transaction
ever, like Firebird?
TL What in heck is a named transaction, and why should we care?
TL regards, tom lane
Sorry guys, my bad. The thing is
Pavel Golub pa...@microolap.com writes:
[ proposal involving ]
SWITCH TRANSACTION first; -- switch context
So, what do you think guys?
No chance :-(. The amount of work that would be required is *vastly*
out of proportion to any possible benefit. Use multiple connections.
On 06/18/2009 02:42 AM, Pavel Golub wrote:
Now to implement customer's desire in PostgreSQL there are two ways:
1. Each script must be executed in the separate connection context
2. Each script must be executed inside critical section, in other
words current scipt must block others until
Pavel Golub pa...@microolap.com writes:
Is there any possibility that Postgres will have named transaction
ever, like Firebird?
What in heck is a named transaction, and why should we care?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On Jun 17, 2009, at 8:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Pavel Golub pa...@microolap.com writes:
Is there any possibility that Postgres will have named transaction
ever, like Firebird?
What in heck is a named transaction, and why should we care?
That Tom Lane, so warm and cuddly!
David
--
Sent via
I'm curious what they ate too
--
Greg
On 17 Jun 2009, at 17:37, David E. Wheeler da...@kineticode.com
wrote:
On Jun 17, 2009, at 8:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Pavel Golub pa...@microolap.com writes:
Is there any possibility that Postgres will have named transaction
ever, like Firebird?
Greg Stark greg.st...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 2009, at 8:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Pavel Golub pa...@microolap.com writes:
Is there any possibility that Postgres will have named
transaction ever, like Firebird?
What in heck is a named transaction, and why should we care?
I'm
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Greg Starkgreg.st...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On 17 Jun 2009, at 17:37, David E. Wheeler da...@kineticode.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 2009, at 8:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Pavel Golub pa...@microolap.com writes:
Is there any possibility that Postgres will have named
Tom Lane wrote:
Pavel Golub pa...@microolap.com writes:
Is there any possibility that Postgres will have named transaction
ever, like Firebird?
What in heck is a named transaction, and why should we care?
Isn't this just another name for a
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
What in heck is a named transaction, and why should we care?
Isn't this just another name for a subtransaction or inner transaction
that can be separately committed?
AFAIK that's an autonomous transaction, at least to some other RDBMSs.
--
Alvaro
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
What in heck is a named transaction, and why should we care?
Isn't this just another name for a subtransaction or inner transaction
that can be separately committed?
AFAIK that's an autonomous transaction,
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
AFAIK that's an autonomous transaction, at least to some other RDBMSs.
Right, but since I had to ask what that was recently I though I'd use a
bit more description :-)
Yes, but some other followups suggest that maybe a named
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Alvaro
Herreraalvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
What in heck is a named transaction, and why should we care?
Isn't this just another name for a subtransaction or inner transaction
that can be separately committed?
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Greg Starkst...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Alvaro
Herreraalvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
What in heck is a named transaction, and why should we care?
Isn't this just another name for a
Greg Stark wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Alvaro
Herreraalvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
AFAIK that's an autonomous transaction, at least to some other RDBMSs.
I have no idea what they are in Firebird but the name conjured up a
different (interesting) idea for me. I had the
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Yes, but some other followups suggest that maybe a named
transaction does something else entirely. Thus my request for a
definition of what the OP is actually asking for.
Well, a quick google search suggests that all three guesses here were
off base.
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 14:38 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Yes, but some other followups suggest that maybe a named
transaction does something else entirely. Thus my request for a
definition of what the OP is actually asking for.
Well, a quick
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
AFAIK that's an autonomous transaction, at least to some other RDBMSs.
Right, but since I had to ask what that was recently I though I'd use a
bit more description :-)
Yes, but some
Kevin Grittner wrote:
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Yes, but some other followups suggest that maybe a named
transaction does something else entirely. Thus my request for a
definition of what the OP is actually asking for.
Well, a quick google search suggests that all three
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Robert Haasrobertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I have no idea what they are in Firebird but the name conjured up a
different (interesting) idea for me. I had the image of naming a
transaction and then being able to have other sessions join that same
transaction.
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
According to the (hard to find) Firebird docs (or rather, the old
Interbase docs, which is all they have):
A single application can start simultaneous transactions. InterBase
extends transaction
management and data manipulation
21 matches
Mail list logo