Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-07 Thread Dan Langille
On 7 Jan 2003 at 16:25, mlw wrote: I think banner ads that build on PostgreSQL's message is a good thing. A RedHat ad, maybe IBM, etc. Companies with a related purpose to the PostgreSQL mission will offset some of the cost and help build the cedibility of the site. Hotel ads and

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-07 Thread Jon Jensen
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Dan Langille wrote: On 7 Jan 2003 at 16:25, mlw wrote: I think banner ads that build on PostgreSQL's message is a good thing. A RedHat ad, maybe IBM, etc. Companies with a related purpose to the PostgreSQL mission will offset some of the cost and help build the

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-07 Thread mlw
Tom Lane wrote: "Marc G. Fournier" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please understand something here ... a large portion of the banner ads are *not* paid ... they are recognition of the many mirror sites that are supporting the project by reducing the amount of bandwidth that is

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-06 Thread mlw
I'll do it on my site. Marc G. Fournier wrote: Any volunteers to act as a tertiary? :) We're actually working on adding a new server online that is offshore, which will also give us another subnet to work off of ... but having a third-party secondary server wouldn't hurt, you are right

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-06 Thread mlw
The site looks fantastic! Great work! Marc G. Fournier wrote: I'm just announcing here, since I'd like to see some ppl testing this out and let us know if there are any problems ... DNS is going to take a little while to propogate, so the old site may still come up in the interium ... another

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-06 Thread mlw
Marc G. Fournier wrote: Any volunteers to act as a tertiary? :) We're actually working on adding a new server online that is offshore, which will also give us another subnet to work off of ... but having a third-party secondary server wouldn't hurt, you are right ... OK, add 64.46.156.80

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-06 Thread greg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The PHP site shows adds. And I just checked ... so does Sourceforge ... Sourceforge is not a good example: they are not a organization of open source people, but a a site owned by a company (OSDN, Inc.) which in turn is owned by another

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-06 Thread Dan Langille
On 6 Jan 2003 at 18:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If the banner ads (as previously stated) do not bring in much revenue, is there a reason to keep them? This has been mentioned more than once AFAIK. It is in payment to those who have provided mirror services. -- Dan Langille :

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-06 Thread mlw
Neil Conway wrote: On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 17:15, Dave Page wrote: There were always ads there Yes -- but AFAIK there were in the process of being phased out (furthermore, the old site only had ads on the initial mirror page, whereas they are much more widespread on the

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-06 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, mlw wrote: The PHP site shows adds. And I just checked ... so does Sourceforge ... ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-06 Thread Scott Lamb
Marc G. Fournier wrote: I'm just announcing here, since I'd like to see some ppl testing this out and let us know if there are any problems ... DNS is going to take a little while to propogate, so the old site may still come up in the interium ... another reason not to announce it right away :)

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-06 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Scott Lamb wrote: Marc G. Fournier wrote: I'm just announcing here, since I'd like to see some ppl testing this out and let us know if there are any problems ... DNS is going to take a little while to propogate, so the old site may still come up in the interium ...

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-06 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Marc G. Fournier writes: I'm just announcing here, since I'd like to see some ppl testing this out and let us know if there are any problems ... DNS is going to take a little while to propogate, so the old site may still come up in the interium ... another reason not to announce it right away

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-06 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Marc G. Fournier writes: I'm just announcing here, since I'd like to see some ppl testing this out and let us know if there are any problems ... DNS is going to take a little while to propogate, so the old site may still come up in the

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-06 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Vince Vielhaber wrote: On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Marc G. Fournier writes: I'm just announcing here, since I'd like to see some ppl testing this out and let us know if there are any problems ... DNS is going to take a little while to propogate,

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-06 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Vince Vielhaber wrote: On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Marc G. Fournier writes: I'm just announcing here, since I'd like to see some ppl testing this out and let us know if there are any problems ...

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-06 Thread Neil Conway
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 13:26, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, mlw wrote: The PHP site shows adds. Ok -- but the vast majority (say, 95%) of OSS sites don't show ads. And I just checked ... so does Sourceforge ... Not on project websites, though. In any case, I'd be fine with

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-06 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Neil Conway wrote: On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 13:26, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, mlw wrote: The PHP site shows adds. Ok -- but the vast majority (say, 95%) of OSS sites don't show ads. Guess that makes us part of the elite 5% that do, eh? You had me

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ... Banner Adds

2003-01-06 Thread mlw
I know I participate on this group periodically, but my last position was CTO at a company, and I currently run my own consulting company. I feel I have a pretty neutral perspective. I don't see what the fuss is all about. Banner adds are good, if the PostgreSQL can get some good RELEVANT

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Peter Mount
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote: I'm just announcing here, since I'd like to see some ppl testing this out and let us know if there are any problems ... DNS is going to take a little while to propogate, so the old site may still come up in the interium ... another reason not to

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Justin Clift
Peter Mount wrote: On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote: I'm just announcing here, since I'd like to see some ppl testing this out and let us know if there are any problems ... DNS is going to take a little while to propogate, so the old site may still come up in the interium ... another

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread greg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Speaking of DNS, we should probably not put all of our eggs in one basket (subnet): $ whois postgresql.org ... Domain servers in listed order: NS.HUB.ORG 64.49.215.5 NS2.HUB.ORG 64.49.215.6 It would

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Peter Mount [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 January 2003 12:28 To: Marc G. Fournier Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ... On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote: I'm just announcing here

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Justin Clift [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 January 2003 13:22 To: Peter Mount Cc: Marc G. Fournier; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ... Peter Mount wrote: However, the bugs link on the main page

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Marc G. Fournier
Any volunteers to act as a tertiary? :) We're actually working on adding a new server online that is offshore, which will also give us another subnet to work off of ... but having a third-party secondary server wouldn't hurt, you are right ... On Sun, 5 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Sunday, January 05, 2003 12:52:11 -0400 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any volunteers to act as a tertiary? :) Sure, I have 2 NS's on my network with good upstream connectivity (UUNET, SPRINT, GENUITY, CW, SAVVIS). (207.158.72.11/207.158.72.45). Let me know what the

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Sunday, January 05, 2003 12:52:11 -0400 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any volunteers to act as a tertiary? :) Sure, I have 2 NS's on my network with good upstream connectivity (UUNET, SPRINT, GENUITY, CW, SAVVIS).

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Larry Rosenman
Looks like your firewall needs to allow TCP/53 connections from me as well. I'm getting RST's. (BTW, TCP/53 can be used for large queries, so it should be allowed globally). LER --On Sunday, January 05, 2003 12:59:42 -0400 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 5 Jan 2003,

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Sunday, January 05, 2003 12:59:42 -0400 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: --On Sunday, January 05, 2003 12:52:11 -0400 Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any volunteers to act as a tertiary? :) Sure, I have 2 NS's on my

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote: AFAICT none of the www mirrors have updated yet; that's starting to seem suspicious. the www mirrors don't update from the portal,they update from what is now the users-lounge area ... the portal itself isn't meant to be mirrors, as its pretty much

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Tom Lane
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote: AFAICT none of the www mirrors have updated yet; that's starting to seem suspicious. the www mirrors don't update from the portal,they update from what is now the users-lounge area ... But they aren't. Try going

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Rod Taylor
Two thoughts: Are there any plans to 'strip' the users lounge of duplicated information? (outdated news, various links, etc.). Will advocacy, gborg, archives, techdocs, etc. be updated to include links back to the portal site? BTW, the 'Users Lounge' search link is broken.

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Rod Taylor wrote: Two thoughts: Are there any plans to 'strip' the users lounge of duplicated information? (outdated news, various links, etc.). Yes ... Will advocacy, gborg, archives, techdocs, etc. be updated to include links back to the portal site? Yes ... BTW,

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote: Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote: AFAICT none of the www mirrors have updated yet; that's starting to seem suspicious. the www mirrors don't update from the portal,they update from what is now the

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Tom Lane
AFAICT none of the www mirrors have updated yet; that's starting to seem suspicious. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Neil Conway
On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 19:40, Marc G. Fournier wrote: I'm just announcing here, since I'd like to see some ppl testing this out and let us know if there are any problems Why are there ads on the page? Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 January 2003 20:34 To: Marc G. Fournier Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ... Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Rod Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 January 2003 20:42 To: Marc G. Fournier Cc: PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ... Two thoughts: Are there any plans to 'strip' the users lounge

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Rod Taylor
Will advocacy, gborg, archives, techdocs, etc. be updated to include links back to the portal site? Don't they already? If they do, it's not obvious. I don't see anything on archives, advocacy, or gborg. It looks like techdocs goes to the users lounge (PostgreSQL Home). -- Rod Taylor

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote: -Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 January 2003 20:34 To: Marc G. Fournier Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ... Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote: Umm, Marc? Is that a mnogo search.cgi? What do you want to do about it - move it or lose it? Move it, but its going to require some fixing up ... let's disable it for now and re-enable it once we've had some time to get it back in order?

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 January 2003 21:06 To: Dave Page Cc: Rod Taylor; PostgreSQL-development Subject: RE: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ... On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote: Umm, Marc

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Neil Conway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 January 2003 22:03 To: Marc G. Fournier Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ... On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 19:40, Marc G. Fournier wrote: I'm just announcing here

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Neil Conway
On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 17:15, Dave Page wrote: There were always ads there Yes -- but AFAIK there were in the process of being phased out (furthermore, the old site only had ads on the initial mirror page, whereas they are much more widespread on the new site). they help pay for the boxes.

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Gavin Sherry
On 5 Jan 2003, Neil Conway wrote: On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 17:15, Dave Page wrote: There were always ads there Yes -- but AFAIK there were in the process of being phased out (furthermore, the old site only had ads on the initial mirror page, whereas they are much more widespread on the new

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Neil Conway wrote: On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 17:15, Dave Page wrote: There were always ads there Yes -- but AFAIK there were in the process of being phased out Not sure where you heard this from ... there were some site that still hadn't had them deployed on them, but there

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Neil Conway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 January 2003 22:38 To: Dave Page Cc: Marc G. Fournier; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ... On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 17:15, Dave Page wrote: There were always ads

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Neil Conway
On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 18:05, Dave Page wrote: Don't get me wrong, I personnally would prefer to remove them, however unless we get suitable corporate sponsorship the servers still have to be paid for somehow. Granted. I'm just trying to point out that putting ads on our webspace is a pretty

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote: Don't get me wrong, I personnally would prefer to remove them, however unless we get suitable corporate sponsorship the servers still have to be paid for somehow. Purely speculation, but I would guess that the ads are not recouping all of the cash it costs

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Tom Lane
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 18:05, Dave Page wrote: Don't get me wrong, I personnally would prefer to remove them, however unless we get suitable corporate sponsorship the servers still have to be paid for somehow. Granted. I'm just trying to point out that

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote: Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 18:05, Dave Page wrote: Don't get me wrong, I personnally would prefer to remove them, however unless we get suitable corporate sponsorship the servers still have to be paid for somehow.

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Bruce Momjian
Neil Conway wrote: On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 17:15, Dave Page wrote: There were always ads there Yes -- but AFAIK there were in the process of being phased out (furthermore, the old site only had ads on the initial mirror page, whereas they are much more widespread on the new site). they

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: Neil Conway wrote: On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 17:15, Dave Page wrote: There were always ads there Yes -- but AFAIK there were in the process of being phased out (furthermore, the old site only had ads on the initial mirror page, whereas they are

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Bruce Momjian
Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: Neil Conway wrote: On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 17:15, Dave Page wrote: There were always ads there Yes -- but AFAIK there were in the process of being phased out (furthermore, the old site only had ads on the initial

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Dan Langille
On 5 Jan 2003, Neil Conway wrote: Obviously, but it's VERY unprofessional for us to show ads to users on our website. It goes without saying, but pretty much every other non-trivial OSS project doesn't have ads on their main website. Displaying ads makes us look more like a Geocities site

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Tom Lane
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please understand something here ... a large portion of the banner ads are *not* paid ... they are recognition of the many mirror sites that are supporting the project by reducing the amount of bandwidth that is required on the central server ...

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-05 Thread Neil Conway
On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 20:32, Marc G. Fournier wrote: Not even close ... in fact, most of the banners there are in recognition of those companies who themselves have provided invaluable resources for the project by providing mirror sites, to reduce the overall traffic hits on the central server

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-04 Thread Tom Lane
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm just announcing here, since I'd like to see some ppl testing this out and let us know if there are any problems ... DNS is going to take a little while to propogate, so the old site may still come up in the interium ... another reason not to

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-04 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote: Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm just announcing here, since I'd like to see some ppl testing this out and let us know if there are any problems ... DNS is going to take a little while to propogate, so the old site may still come up in the

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-04 Thread Tom Lane
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: the portal itself is not mirrored, butif you go to, for instance UsersLounge or Downloads, it then gives you the option of which mirror to go to ... Ah. But if I do either, I see Warning: pg_exec(): supplied argument is not a valid PostgreSQL link

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-04 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote: Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: the portal itself is not mirrored, butif you go to, for instance UsersLounge or Downloads, it then gives you the option of which mirror to go to ... Ah. But if I do either, I see Warning: pg_exec():

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-04 Thread Justin Clift
Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote: Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: the portal itself is not mirrored, butif you go to, for instance UsersLounge or Downloads, it then gives you the option of which mirror to go to ... Ah. But if I do either, I see

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-04 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Justin Clift wrote: www.postgresql.org/doc - www.ca.postgresql.org/users-lounge/ If we can avoid it, let's ... if I recall correctly, we originally set that up in order to get around some issues we had with originally moving over to the new site way way back ...

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-04 Thread Justin Clift
Hi Tom, Sorry about that. Was a combo of two simple problems. It's fixed now. :-) Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift Tom Lane wrote: Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: the portal itself is not mirrored, butif you go to, for instance UsersLounge or Downloads, it then gives you

Re: [HACKERS] New Portal in Place, DNS switched ...

2003-01-04 Thread Tom Lane
Justin Clift [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It's fixed now. :-) Better, thanks. Minor suggestion: could we get ALT text for all the flags? Right now it's there for USA, UK, Italy, but not the rest ... regards, tom lane ---(end of