Re: [HACKERS] Operator family docs
Tom Lane wrote: Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/catalog-pg-opfamily.html states that "Operator families are described at length in Section 33.14." which does not seem to be the case. Did it get missed in a commit? No, I haven't got round to updating xindex.sgml yet. I'm planning to do just one pass over it after all the opfamily and sorting dust settles... In the related commits so far, I've just been touching reference pages for the most part (catalogs.sgml is a reference page in my mind). OK, thanks. Regards, Dave. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [HACKERS] Operator family docs
Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/catalog-pg-opfamily.html > states that > "Operator families are described at length in Section 33.14." > which does not seem to be the case. Did it get missed in a commit? No, I haven't got round to updating xindex.sgml yet. I'm planning to do just one pass over it after all the opfamily and sorting dust settles... In the related commits so far, I've just been touching reference pages for the most part (catalogs.sgml is a reference page in my mind). regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
