On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Josh berkus wrote:
> Based on that concept, I wrote a query which is now on the wiki page.
> Please fix it if it's not showing what we want it to show.
Sorry, I got caught up with something last night. I did this this
morning Pacific time.
I've made a number of p
Okay. I'll look at it later today.
--
Peter Geoghegan
On 03/30/2016 02:47 PM, Josh berkus wrote:
> On 03/29/2016 07:43 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> Do you think it would be okay if the SQL query to detect potentially
>> affected indexes only considered the leading attribute? Since that's
>> the only attribute that could use abbreviated keys, it ought
On 03/29/2016 07:43 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> A corrupt index could easily fail to detect uniqueness violations (because
>> searches fail to find entries they should find). Not sure I believe that
>> it would make false reports of a uniquenes
Peter Geoghegan writes:
> Do you think it would be okay if the SQL query to detect potentially
> affected indexes only considered the leading attribute? Since that's
> the only attribute that could use abbreviated keys, it ought to be
> safe to not require users to REINDEX indexes that happen to h
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> A corrupt index could easily fail to detect uniqueness violations (because
> searches fail to find entries they should find). Not sure I believe that
> it would make false reports of a uniqueness conflict that's not really
> there.
Sure. But loo
Peter Geoghegan writes:
> I made a pass over this, and changed some things. I noticed it said
> something about incorrect unique violations on affected systems. Is
> that really possible?
A corrupt index could easily fail to detect uniqueness violations (because
searches fail to find entries they
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Josh berkus wrote:
> For Thursday's release, I've added a wiki page to give users more
> information about the strxfrm() issue, especially since we're going to
> ask them to do a bunch of REINDEXing.
I made a pass over this, and changed some things. I noticed it s
