Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

2003-01-13 Thread greg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message I have no problem with ads being put there, but they should load at least as fast as the rest of the site. They do so currently, but not always, it seems... The ads are coming from another

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

2003-01-13 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth. WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell you what to plan for there. Sorry to be dense, but what time period is this for? Any given day. It's disk space, not traffic. On www/ftp.us I don't even notice the

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

2003-01-13 Thread Dan Langille
On 13 Jan 2003 at 9:45, Vince Vielhaber wrote: On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth. WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell you what to plan for there. Sorry to be dense, but what time period is this for? Any given day. It's disk space,

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

2003-01-13 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dan Langille wrote: On 13 Jan 2003 at 9:45, Vince Vielhaber wrote: On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth. WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell you what to plan for there. Sorry to be dense, but what time period

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

2003-01-13 Thread Ross J. Reedstrom
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 10:01:38AM -0500, Vince Vielhaber wrote: On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dan Langille wrote: On 13 Jan 2003 at 9:45, Vince Vielhaber wrote: On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth. WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

2003-01-13 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 10:01:38AM -0500, Vince Vielhaber wrote: On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dan Langille wrote: On 13 Jan 2003 at 9:45, Vince Vielhaber wrote: On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FTP is just over 800MB, plan

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

2003-01-13 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Ross J. Reedstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 January 2003 15:16 To: Vince Vielhaber Cc: Dan Langille; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up? And there was a statement upthread from someone (Marc

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

2003-01-13 Thread greg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message Go back and reread the end of it. The first part was about the ads, the second was about mirrors. Sorry for the confusion: Dave is right, I just asked the question wrong. I am not really

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

2003-01-13 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote: -Original Message- From: Ross J. Reedstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 January 2003 15:16 To: Vince Vielhaber Cc: Dan Langille; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

2003-01-13 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 January 2003 15:42 To: Dave Page Cc: Ross J. Reedstrom; Dan Langille; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up? On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote: Total Hits

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

2003-01-13 Thread Robert Treat
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 10:47, Dave Page wrote: -Original Message- From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 January 2003 15:42 To: Dave Page Cc: Ross J. Reedstrom; Dan Langille; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

2003-01-13 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote: On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote: Total Hits 1339547 Total Files 1064536 Total Pages 324346 Total Visits 58178 Total KBytes 2712883 In other words, 2.7Gb in 8/9 days. I'm not sure I'd call that noise :-) It's

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

2003-01-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Area902.Com is a Free Service provided by Hub.Org Networking Services Because hub.org is also displaying the postgresql.org page on the same subnet, so the disparity should in theory be quite controllable. *If* we are going to keep the ads (and my vote is a strong

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

2003-01-12 Thread Kevin Brown
Greg Copeland wrote: I guess I don't understand the problem. The ads are very small and completely innocuous. Why would anyone care? Who's complaining and why? When I loaded the new site for the first time (after the ads were placed there), the ads stalled the loading process until I simply

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

2003-01-12 Thread Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 07:03, Kevin Brown wrote: I have no problem with ads being put there, but they should load at least as fast as the rest of the site. Huh!? :-) cheers -- vbi -- Packages should build-depend on what they should build-depend. -- Santiago Vila on debian-devel

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

2003-01-07 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, mlw wrote: This is a serious inquiry, very serious. People are complaining about ads. What do we need in the form of equipment, bandwidth, etc. FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth. WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell you what to plan for there. On www/ftp.us I don't

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

2003-01-07 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On 7 Jan 2003, Greg Copeland wrote: On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 16:46, Vince Vielhaber wrote: On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, mlw wrote: This is a serious inquiry, very serious. People are complaining about ads. What do we need in the form of equipment, bandwidth, etc. FTP is just over 800MB,

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

2003-01-07 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 January 2003 22:47 To: mlw Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Marc G. Fournier Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up? On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, mlw wrote: This is a serious inquiry, very